CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & RNAsubopt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold RNAsubopt
MCC 0.574 > 0.531
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.557 ± 0.067 > 0.508 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.480 > 0.473
Positive Predictive Value 0.691 > 0.601
Total TP 900 > 887
Total TN 338691 > 338518
Total FP 466 < 656
Total FP CONTRA 58 < 85
Total FP INCONS 344 < 503
Total FP COMP 64 < 68
Total FN 975 < 988
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and RNAsubopt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNAsubopt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNAsubopt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and RNAsubopt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNAsubopt).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 900
Total TN 338691
Total FP 466
Total FP CONTRA 58
Total FP INCONS 344
Total FP COMP 64
Total FN 975
Total Scores
MCC 0.574
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.557 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.480
Positive Predictive Value 0.691
Nr of predictions 55

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 623 7 0 7 0 20
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 0 5 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.89 0.79 1.00 31 6074 1 0 0 1 8
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 13 5 3 5 8
2WW9_F - 0.69 0.70 0.70 7 290 3 0 3 0 3
2WW9_D - 0.29 0.12 0.75 3 1949 1 0 1 0 23
2WW9_E - 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 557 0 0 0 0 10
2WWQ_V 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2906 2 0 1 1 9
2XQD_Y 0.77 0.67 0.90 18 2830 2 0 2 0 9
2ZZM_B 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 3468 15 0 15 0 29
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.62 0.55 0.70 21 4156 9 0 9 0 17
3AKZ_H 0.44 0.39 0.50 11 2679 11 2 9 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.69 0.63 0.76 22 3211 7 1 6 0 13
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3G4S_9 0.51 0.39 0.69 22 7349 10 1 9 0 35
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3GX2_A 0.72 0.55 0.96 22 4348 2 0 1 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.63 0.58 0.70 19 4251 9 0 8 1 14
3IYQ_A 0.33 0.34 0.32 32 60627 71 19 48 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.42 0.65 56 70790 31 3 27 1 76
3IZF_C 0.71 0.61 0.83 33 6863 7 0 7 0 21
3J0L_2 - 0.36 0.33 0.39 11 6188 19 2 15 2 22
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 1 4 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1222 3 0 3 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.51 0.50 0.53 8 1113 7 3 4 0 8
3J16_L 0.29 0.23 0.37 7 2756 12 0 12 0 23
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2834 16 0 16 0 32
3JYX_4 0.35 0.30 0.42 10 12222 23 3 11 9 23
3JYX_3 0.62 0.63 0.61 17 6300 19 1 10 8 10
3KTW_C - 0.74 0.63 0.87 27 4529 5 2 2 1 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.81 0.69 0.95 42 9136 3 0 2 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.64 0.54 0.78 14 1998 4 0 4 0 12
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.91 30 6988 6 1 2 3 16
3O58_2 0.74 0.74 0.74 28 7222 11 3 7 1 10
3O58_3 0.43 0.34 0.55 12 12381 17 0 10 7 23
3PDR_A 0.69 0.56 0.85 40 12833 9 0 7 2 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.65 0.50 0.84 21 3891 4 1 3 0 21
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.51 0.32 0.80 12 3555 3 2 1 0 25
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 34 2 23 9 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14

^top



Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 887
Total TN 338518
Total FP 656
Total FP CONTRA 85
Total FP INCONS 503
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 988
Total Scores
MCC 0.531
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.508 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.473
Positive Predictive Value 0.601
Nr of predictions 55

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 623 7 0 7 0 20
2KRL_A - 0.52 0.43 0.65 17 5125 12 3 6 3 23
2KX8_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 846 0 0 0 0 3
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.77 0.86 30 6070 9 0 5 4 9
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.15 0.12 0.21 3 1939 11 4 7 0 23
2WW9_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 556 5 0 5 0 14
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.68 0.86 19 2904 5 0 3 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.75 0.67 0.86 18 2829 3 0 3 0 9
2ZZM_B 0.23 0.22 0.26 7 3459 20 2 18 0 25
2ZZN_D 0.48 0.44 0.52 12 2462 11 1 10 0 15
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.39 0.36 0.43 10 2678 13 2 11 0 18
3AM1_B - 0.91 0.83 1.00 29 3211 0 0 0 0 6
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3G4S_9 0.28 0.23 0.35 13 7344 24 1 23 0 44
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3GX2_A 0.44 0.38 0.54 15 4343 14 1 12 1 25
3IVN_B 0.76 0.58 1.00 18 2328 0 0 0 0 13
3IWN_A 0.63 0.58 0.70 19 4251 9 0 8 1 14
3IYQ_A 0.33 0.36 0.30 34 60614 82 17 61 4 60
3IZ4_A 0.51 0.47 0.56 62 70766 49 8 40 1 70
3IZF_C 0.70 0.61 0.80 33 6862 8 1 7 0 21
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 25 0 21 4 25
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 1 4 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.31 0.42 5 1116 7 1 6 0 11
3J16_L 0.41 0.37 0.48 11 2752 12 1 11 0 19
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2829 21 0 21 0 32
3JYX_4 0.19 0.21 0.17 7 12204 38 11 24 3 26
3JYX_3 0.63 0.63 0.63 17 6301 21 1 9 11 10
3KTW_C - 0.75 0.65 0.88 28 4528 5 2 2 1 15
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.77 0.69 0.86 42 9131 8 0 7 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.57 0.50 0.65 13 1996 7 0 7 0 13
3NPB_A 0.75 0.65 0.86 30 6986 7 1 4 2 16
3O58_2 0.72 0.74 0.70 28 7220 13 4 8 1 10
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 34 2 21 11 23
3PDR_A 0.75 0.63 0.90 45 12830 7 1 4 2 27
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4AOB_A 0.52 0.43 0.64 18 4343 11 2 8 1 24
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 0 7 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.