CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold UNAFold
MCC 0.464 > 0.445
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.549 ± 0.064 > 0.548 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.387 < 0.395
Positive Predictive Value 0.557 > 0.502
Total TP 2020 < 2059
Total TN 13351579 > 13351108
Total FP 1754 < 2212
Total FP CONTRA 245 < 292
Total FP INCONS 1363 < 1748
Total FP COMP 146 < 172
Total FN 3193 > 3154
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2020
Total TN 13351579
Total FP 1754
Total FP CONTRA 245
Total FP INCONS 1363
Total FP COMP 146
Total FN 3193
Total Scores
MCC 0.464
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.549 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.387
Positive Predictive Value 0.557
Nr of predictions 58

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 623 7 0 7 0 20
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 0 5 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.89 0.79 1.00 31 6074 1 0 0 1 8
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WDL_A - 0.41 0.34 0.50 410 3937401 411 25 385 1 794
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 13 5 3 5 8
2WW9_F - 0.69 0.70 0.70 7 290 3 0 3 0 3
2WW9_E - 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 557 0 0 0 0 10
2WW9_D - 0.29 0.12 0.75 3 1949 1 0 1 0 23
2WWQ_V 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2906 2 0 1 1 9
2XQD_Y 0.77 0.67 0.90 18 2830 2 0 2 0 9
2ZZM_B 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 3468 15 0 15 0 29
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.62 0.55 0.70 21 4156 9 0 9 0 17
3AKZ_H 0.44 0.39 0.50 11 2679 11 2 9 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.69 0.63 0.76 22 3211 7 1 6 0 13
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3G4S_9 0.51 0.39 0.69 22 7349 10 1 9 0 35
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3GX2_A 0.72 0.55 0.96 22 4348 2 0 1 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.63 0.58 0.70 19 4251 9 0 8 1 14
3IYQ_A 0.33 0.34 0.32 32 60627 71 19 48 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.42 0.65 56 70790 31 3 27 1 76
3IZF_C 0.71 0.61 0.83 33 6863 7 0 7 0 21
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 1 4 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.36 0.33 0.39 11 6188 19 2 15 2 22
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1222 3 0 3 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.51 0.50 0.53 8 1113 7 3 4 0 8
3J16_L 0.29 0.23 0.37 7 2756 12 0 12 0 23
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2834 16 0 16 0 32
3JYX_3 0.62 0.63 0.61 17 6300 19 1 10 8 10
3JYX_4 0.35 0.30 0.42 10 12222 23 3 11 9 23
3JYX_5 - 0.35 0.32 0.39 286 5022127 525 142 310 73 607
3KIY_A - 0.43 0.34 0.55 424 4053360 352 20 324 8 817
3KTW_C - 0.74 0.63 0.87 27 4529 5 2 2 1 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.81 0.69 0.95 42 9136 3 0 2 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.64 0.54 0.78 14 1998 4 0 4 0 12
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.91 30 6988 6 1 2 3 16
3O58_3 0.43 0.34 0.55 12 12381 17 0 10 7 23
3O58_2 0.74 0.74 0.74 28 7222 11 3 7 1 10
3PDR_A 0.69 0.56 0.85 40 12833 9 0 7 2 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.65 0.50 0.84 21 3891 4 1 3 0 21
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.51 0.32 0.80 12 3555 3 2 1 0 25
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 34 2 23 9 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2059
Total TN 13351108
Total FP 2212
Total FP CONTRA 292
Total FP INCONS 1748
Total FP COMP 172
Total FN 3154
Total Scores
MCC 0.445
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.548 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.395
Positive Predictive Value 0.502
Nr of predictions 58

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 623 7 0 7 0 20
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 1 0 0 1 5
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WDL_A - 0.40 0.34 0.47 415 3937338 469 30 438 1 789
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_E - 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 557 0 0 0 0 10
2WW9_D - 0.18 0.12 0.30 3 1943 7 3 4 0 23
2WWQ_V 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 2905 3 0 2 1 9
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.25 6 3462 18 0 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 2 0 2 0 6
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.80 0.74 0.88 28 4154 4 0 4 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.43 0.39 0.48 11 2678 12 2 10 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.68 0.63 0.73 22 3210 8 1 7 0 13
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3G4S_9 0.50 0.39 0.67 22 7348 11 1 10 0 35
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3GX2_A 0.68 0.55 0.85 22 4345 5 0 4 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.74 0.67 0.81 22 4251 6 0 5 1 11
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.33 0.28 31 60617 82 22 56 4 63
3IZ4_A 0.51 0.45 0.58 60 70772 50 4 40 6 72
3IZF_C 0.70 0.61 0.80 33 6862 8 1 7 0 21
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.26 8 6185 25 2 21 2 25
3J0L_7 - 0.48 0.41 0.58 7 1213 5 0 5 0 10
3J0L_a - 0.51 0.50 0.53 8 1113 7 3 4 0 8
3J16_L 0.26 0.23 0.30 7 2752 16 1 15 0 23
3JYV_7 0.22 0.19 0.29 6 2829 15 0 15 0 26
3JYX_3 0.62 0.63 0.61 17 6300 22 1 10 11 10
3JYX_4 0.32 0.30 0.34 10 12217 31 3 16 12 23
3JYX_5 - 0.31 0.31 0.31 277 5021967 702 167 454 81 616
3KIY_A - 0.41 0.35 0.48 429 4053241 467 22 436 9 812
3KTW_C - 0.77 0.65 0.90 28 4529 4 2 1 1 15
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.78 0.65 0.94 30 6989 5 0 2 3 16
3O58_3 0.35 0.34 0.35 12 12369 33 1 21 11 23
3O58_2 0.71 0.71 0.71 27 7222 12 4 7 1 11
3PDR_A 0.77 0.64 0.94 46 12831 5 0 3 2 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 5 26 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.