CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Fold
MCC 0.517 > 0.456
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.236 > 0.410 ± 0.224
Sensitivity 0.422 > 0.392
Positive Predictive Value 0.642 > 0.539
Total TP 111 > 103
Total TN 33387 > 33369
Total FP 72 < 100
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 13
Total FP INCONS 54 < 75
Total FP COMP 10 < 12
Total FN 152 < 160
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Fold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 111
Total TN 33387
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 152
Total Scores
MCC 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.236
Sensitivity 0.422
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 103
Total TN 33369
Total FP 100
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 160
Total Scores
MCC 0.456
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.410 ± 0.224
Sensitivity 0.392
Positive Predictive Value 0.539
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11744 43 5 27 11 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.57 0.82 31 7102 7 1 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1263 7 1 6 0 14
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.