CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Mastr(20)
MCC 0.564 > 0.542
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.188 > 0.473 ± 0.228
Sensitivity 0.457 > 0.366
Positive Predictive Value 0.703 < 0.809
Total TP 111 > 89
Total TN 31862 < 31910
Total FP 57 > 23
Total FP CONTRA 6 > 1
Total FP INCONS 41 > 20
Total FP COMP 10 > 2
Total FN 132 < 154
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Mastr(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 111
Total TN 31862
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 132
Total Scores
MCC 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.703
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 89
Total TN 31910
Total FP 23
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 20
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 154
Total Scores
MCC 0.542
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.473 ± 0.228
Sensitivity 0.366
Positive Predictive Value 0.809
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2194 0 0 0 0 17
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 7 0 6 1 22
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4AOB_A 0.39 0.26 0.58 11 4352 9 0 8 1 31
4ENB_A 0.39 0.16 1.00 3 1272 0 0 0 0 16
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.