CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for UNAFold & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric UNAFold PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.490 > 0.102
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.472 ± 0.175 > 0.050 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.417 > 0.020
Positive Predictive Value 0.584 > 0.538
Total TP 149 > 7
Total TN 42653 < 42895
Total FP 120 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 14 > 0
Total FP INCONS 92 > 6
Total FP COMP 14 < 19
Total FN 208 < 350
P-value 1.43692248862e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 149
Total TN 42653
Total FP 120
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 92
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 208
Total Scores
MCC 0.490
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.472 ± 0.175
Sensitivity 0.417
Positive Predictive Value 0.584
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J16_L 0.26 0.23 0.30 7 2752 16 1 15 0 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 5 26 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 7
Total TN 42895
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 350
Total Scores
MCC 0.102
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.050 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.020
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.