CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for UNAFold & Pknots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric UNAFold Pknots
MCC 0.595 > 0.547
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.564 ± 0.070 > 0.550 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.514 > 0.489
Positive Predictive Value 0.695 > 0.620
Total TP 847 > 806
Total TN 207173 > 207090
Total FP 442 < 540
Total FP CONTRA 47 < 74
Total FP INCONS 324 < 421
Total FP COMP 71 > 45
Total FN 802 < 843
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Pknots).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Pknots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Pknots).

^top





Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 847
Total TN 207173
Total FP 442
Total FP CONTRA 47
Total FP INCONS 324
Total FP COMP 71
Total FN 802
Total Scores
MCC 0.595
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.564 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 623 7 0 7 0 20
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 1 0 0 1 5
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_D - 0.18 0.12 0.30 3 1943 7 3 4 0 23
2WW9_E - 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 557 0 0 0 0 10
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WWQ_V 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 2905 3 0 2 1 9
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.25 6 3462 18 0 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 2 0 2 0 6
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.80 0.74 0.88 28 4154 4 0 4 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.43 0.39 0.48 11 2678 12 2 10 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.68 0.63 0.73 22 3210 8 1 7 0 13
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3G4S_9 0.50 0.39 0.67 22 7348 11 1 10 0 35
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3GX2_A 0.68 0.55 0.85 22 4345 5 0 4 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.74 0.67 0.81 22 4251 6 0 5 1 11
3IZF_C 0.70 0.61 0.80 33 6862 8 1 7 0 21
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.26 8 6185 25 2 21 2 25
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_7 - 0.48 0.41 0.58 7 1213 5 0 5 0 10
3J0L_a - 0.51 0.50 0.53 8 1113 7 3 4 0 8
3J16_L 0.26 0.23 0.30 7 2752 16 1 15 0 23
3JYV_7 0.22 0.19 0.29 6 2829 15 0 15 0 26
3JYX_4 0.32 0.30 0.34 10 12217 31 3 16 12 23
3JYX_3 0.62 0.63 0.61 17 6300 22 1 10 11 10
3KTW_C - 0.77 0.65 0.90 28 4529 4 2 1 1 15
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.78 0.65 0.94 30 6989 5 0 2 3 16
3O58_2 0.71 0.71 0.71 27 7222 12 4 7 1 11
3O58_3 0.35 0.34 0.35 12 12369 33 1 21 11 23
3PDR_A 0.77 0.64 0.94 46 12831 5 0 3 2 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 5 26 11 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14

^top



Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 806
Total TN 207090
Total FP 540
Total FP CONTRA 74
Total FP INCONS 421
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 843
Total Scores
MCC 0.547
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.550 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.489
Positive Predictive Value 0.620
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - 0.11 0.10 0.17 2 618 10 0 10 0 18
2KRL_A - 0.67 0.58 0.79 23 5122 9 2 4 3 17
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 1522 3 1 2 0 5
2LKR_A - 0.44 0.44 0.45 17 6067 22 4 17 1 22
2RP0_A - 0.66 0.58 0.78 7 342 2 1 1 0 5
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2WW9_D - 0.35 0.31 0.42 8 1934 11 2 9 0 18
2WW9_E - 0.39 0.29 0.57 4 554 3 0 3 0 10
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WWQ_V 0.24 0.21 0.29 6 2905 16 1 14 1 22
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2ZZM_B 0.20 0.19 0.23 6 3460 20 2 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.86 0.78 0.95 21 2463 1 0 1 0 6
3A2K_C 0.45 0.43 0.48 12 2901 13 2 11 0 16
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.84 0.75 0.95 21 2679 1 1 0 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.91 0.83 1.00 29 3211 0 0 0 0 6
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 2 0 0 2 7
3G4S_9 0.25 0.21 0.31 12 7342 27 0 27 0 45
3GCA_A - 0.35 0.24 0.57 4 521 3 0 3 0 13
3GX2_A 0.47 0.40 0.55 16 4342 14 1 12 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 0 1 0 11
3IWN_A 0.21 0.18 0.25 6 4254 18 1 17 0 27
3IZF_C 0.70 0.61 0.80 33 6862 8 1 7 0 21
3J0L_2 - 0.36 0.36 0.36 12 6183 23 3 18 2 21
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 2 3 0 4
3J0L_7 - 0.28 0.29 0.29 5 1208 12 0 12 0 12
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.31 0.42 5 1116 7 1 6 0 11
3J16_L 0.34 0.30 0.41 9 2753 13 0 13 0 21
3JYV_7 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 11
3JYX_4 0.18 0.21 0.16 7 12203 41 13 23 5 26
3JYX_3 0.34 0.37 0.31 10 6296 24 9 13 2 17
3KTW_C - 0.49 0.44 0.56 19 4526 16 2 13 1 24
3LA5_A 0.80 0.65 1.00 22 2463 0 0 0 0 12
3NDB_M - 0.77 0.69 0.88 42 9132 7 1 5 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.55 0.50 0.62 13 1995 8 0 8 0 13
3NPB_A 0.76 0.67 0.86 31 6985 8 1 4 3 15
3O58_2 0.83 0.74 0.93 28 7230 3 0 2 1 10
3O58_3 0.27 0.31 0.24 11 12357 38 11 24 3 24
3PDR_A 0.54 0.44 0.65 32 12831 19 0 17 2 40
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.65 0.52 0.81 22 3889 5 0 5 0 20
3U4M_B - 0.26 0.22 0.32 8 3135 17 0 17 0 29
3UZL_B 0.75 0.59 0.96 22 3547 1 0 1 0 15
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.25 8 11749 36 3 21 12 25
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4AOB_A 0.17 0.14 0.21 6 4343 23 1 21 1 36
4ENB_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 15 1258 2 1 1 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.