CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(seed) & Carnac(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(seed) Carnac(20)
MCC 0.736 > 0.413
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.667 ± 0.095 > 0.316 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.607 > 0.190
Positive Predictive Value 0.898 < 0.911
Total TP 362 > 113
Total TN 55058 < 55337
Total FP 57 > 26
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 2
Total FP INCONS 41 > 9
Total FP COMP 16 > 15
Total FN 234 < 483
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(seed) and Carnac(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and Carnac(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and Carnac(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(seed) and Carnac(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and Carnac(20)).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 362
Total TN 55058
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 234
Total Scores
MCC 0.736
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.667 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.607
Positive Predictive Value 0.898
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 2 0 0 2 0
PDB_00213 0.85 0.73 1.00 30 5020 0 0 0 0 11
PDB_00553 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 11
PDB_00810 0.76 0.59 1.00 10 1071 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01050 0.68 0.46 1.00 6 624 1 0 0 1 7
PDB_01152 0.92 0.86 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00658 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00664 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00667 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00668 0.35 0.21 0.60 3 985 3 0 2 1 11
RFA_00672 0.41 0.31 0.57 4 896 3 0 3 0 9
RFA_00673 0.23 0.14 0.40 2 1123 4 0 3 1 12
RFA_00674 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00675 0.35 0.21 0.60 3 985 3 0 2 1 11
RFA_00677 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00678 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 940 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00680 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00704 0.32 0.21 0.50 3 984 4 0 3 1 11
RFA_00707 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1029 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00715 0.30 0.14 0.67 2 943 2 0 1 1 12
RFA_00717 0.30 0.21 0.43 3 896 4 0 4 0 11
RFA_00730 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00731 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00733 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00734 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00736 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00737 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00745 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 936 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00749 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00758 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 894 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00762 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00763 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00764 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00765 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00786 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 5021 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00791 0.92 0.88 0.97 28 5122 1 0 1 0 4
RFA_00792 0.97 0.94 1.00 30 5020 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00801 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 5021 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 113
Total TN 55337
Total FP 26
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 483
Total Scores
MCC 0.413
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.316 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.190
Positive Predictive Value 0.911
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
PDB_00213 0.58 0.34 1.00 14 5036 0 0 0 0 27
PDB_00553 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 11
PDB_00810 0.64 0.41 1.00 7 1074 0 0 0 0 10
PDB_01050 0.62 0.38 1.00 5 625 1 0 0 1 8
PDB_01152 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 550 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00667 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00668 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00672 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00673 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00674 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00675 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00677 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00678 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 946 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00680 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00704 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00707 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00715 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 946 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00717 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00730 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00731 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00733 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00734 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00736 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00737 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00745 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 941 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00749 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00758 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 12
RFA_00762 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00763 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00764 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00765 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00786 0.25 0.13 0.50 4 5042 4 1 3 0 28
RFA_00791 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 32
RFA_00792 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5046 4 1 3 0 32
RFA_00801 0.31 0.16 0.63 5 5042 4 0 3 1 27

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.