CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.487 > 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.492 ± 0.120 > 0.289 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.277 > 0.224
Positive Predictive Value 0.861 < 0.923
Total TP 192 > 155
Total TN 133043 < 133098
Total FP 44 > 29
Total FP CONTRA 2 > 0
Total FP INCONS 29 > 13
Total FP COMP 13 < 16
Total FN 501 < 538
P-value 6.32937386918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 192
Total TN 133043
Total FP 44
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 501
Total Scores
MCC 0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.492 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.277
Positive Predictive Value 0.861
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00749 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00764 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00765 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
SPR_00277 0.72 0.52 1.00 11 2915 0 0 0 0 10
SPR_00721 0.72 0.57 0.92 12 2913 3 0 1 2 9
SPR_01157 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 2754 6 0 5 1 5
SRP_00020 0.52 0.27 1.00 9 5556 0 0 0 0 24
SRP_00058 0.30 0.09 1.00 3 5775 0 0 0 0 31
SRP_00084 0.30 0.09 1.00 3 5457 0 0 0 0 31
SRP_00105 0.30 0.09 1.00 3 5562 0 0 0 0 31
SRP_00134 0.32 0.10 1.00 3 5992 0 0 0 0 26
SRP_00141 0.27 0.07 1.00 3 6325 0 0 0 0 38
SRP_00182 0.43 0.22 0.85 22 46030 4 0 4 0 79
SRP_00231 0.53 0.47 0.59 16 5433 11 1 10 0 18
SRP_00273 0.56 0.48 0.66 19 6757 10 1 9 0 21
SRP_00274 0.28 0.08 1.00 3 6900 0 0 0 0 35
SRP_00338 0.29 0.08 1.00 3 5457 0 0 0 0 33
SRP_00341 0.31 0.10 1.00 3 4750 0 0 0 0 28
SRP_00357 0.29 0.08 1.00 3 5353 0 0 0 0 33

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 155
Total TN 133098
Total FP 29
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 538
Total Scores
MCC 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.289 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.224
Positive Predictive Value 0.923
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00658 0.38 0.14 1.00 2 1126 1 0 0 1 12
RFA_00664 0.38 0.14 1.00 2 988 1 0 0 1 12
RFA_00749 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00764 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00765 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
SPR_00277 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 21
SPR_00721 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 21
SPR_01157 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 21
SRP_00020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5565 0 0 0 0 33
SRP_00058 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5778 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00084 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00105 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5565 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00134 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5995 0 0 0 0 29
SRP_00141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6328 0 0 0 0 41
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00231 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00273 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6786 0 0 0 0 40
SRP_00274 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6903 0 0 0 0 38
SRP_00338 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 36
SRP_00341 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 31
SRP_00357 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5356 0 0 0 0 36

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.