CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Afold
MCC 0.697 > 0.589
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.534 ± 0.157 > 0.527 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.651 > 0.592
Positive Predictive Value 0.747 > 0.588
Total TP 458 > 416
Total TN 322070 > 321975
Total FP 232 < 392
Total FP CONTRA 29 < 73
Total FP INCONS 126 < 219
Total FP COMP 77 < 100
Total FN 245 < 287
P-value 3.51155234096e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 458
Total TN 322070
Total FP 232
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 126
Total FP COMP 77
Total FN 245
Total Scores
MCC 0.697
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.534 ± 0.157
Sensitivity 0.651
Positive Predictive Value 0.747
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 20 0 4 16 13
RFA_00628 0.92 0.88 0.95 76 57211 18 0 4 14 10
RFA_00630 0.83 0.80 0.86 70 56872 29 0 11 18 17
RFA_00654 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2414 1 0 1 0 18
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 12 1 3 8 8
SRP_00241 0.48 0.50 0.46 41 45967 50 15 33 2 41
SRP_00340 0.59 0.61 0.57 50 41240 44 7 31 6 32

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 416
Total TN 321975
Total FP 392
Total FP CONTRA 73
Total FP INCONS 219
Total FP COMP 100
Total FN 287
Total Scores
MCC 0.589
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.592
Positive Predictive Value 0.588
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00626 0.89 0.86 0.93 75 56535 31 2 4 25 12
RFA_00628 0.83 0.80 0.85 69 57210 38 1 11 26 17
RFA_00630 0.60 0.60 0.60 52 56866 46 8 27 11 35
RFA_00654 0.27 0.28 0.28 5 2397 14 2 11 1 13
RFA_00658 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 1116 5 0 3 2 5
RFA_00664 0.07 0.07 0.09 1 979 11 0 10 1 13
RFA_00708 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 1027 3 0 3 0 9
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 5 0 4 1 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 10 3 5 2 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 6 0 2 4 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 5 1 0 4 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 16 2 13 1 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 12 1 10 1 10
RFA_00816 0.59 0.66 0.53 27 23169 33 13 11 9 14
RFA_00818 0.19 0.22 0.17 9 20247 48 19 26 3 32
SRP_00241 0.54 0.59 0.51 48 45961 50 11 36 3 34
SRP_00340 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 41235 47 9 36 2 34

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.