CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Fold
MCC 0.681 > 0.550
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.547 ± 0.131 > 0.485 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.649 > 0.561
Positive Predictive Value 0.717 > 0.541
Total TP 576 > 498
Total TN 406244 > 406127
Total FP 315 < 543
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 102
Total FP INCONS 179 < 320
Total FP COMP 88 < 121
Total FN 312 < 390
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 576
Total TN 406244
Total FP 315
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 179
Total FP COMP 88
Total FN 312
Total Scores
MCC 0.681
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.547 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.649
Positive Predictive Value 0.717
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00619 - 0.37 0.41 0.34 16 22744 36 12 19 5 23
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 20 0 4 16 13
RFA_00628 0.92 0.88 0.95 76 57211 18 0 4 14 10
RFA_00630 0.83 0.80 0.86 70 56872 29 0 11 18 17
RFA_00654 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2414 1 0 1 0 18
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00817 0.77 0.78 0.76 32 21903 13 5 5 3 9
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 12 1 3 8 8
SRP_00241 0.48 0.50 0.46 41 45967 50 15 33 2 41
SRP_00331 0.69 0.69 0.70 60 37589 29 2 24 3 27
SRP_00340 0.59 0.61 0.57 50 41240 44 7 31 6 32

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 498
Total TN 406127
Total FP 543
Total FP CONTRA 102
Total FP INCONS 320
Total FP COMP 121
Total FN 390
Total Scores
MCC 0.550
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.485 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.561
Positive Predictive Value 0.541
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00619 - 0.30 0.33 0.27 13 22743 48 12 23 13 26
RFA_00626 0.86 0.82 0.90 71 56537 35 2 6 27 16
RFA_00628 0.87 0.84 0.90 72 57211 30 0 8 22 14
RFA_00630 0.62 0.63 0.61 55 56863 52 9 26 17 32
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2400 15 2 13 0 18
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00767 0.44 0.44 0.44 8 1873 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00768 0.45 0.44 0.47 8 1874 10 1 8 1 10
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 3 1 0 2 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2000 18 2 14 2 16
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00816 0.61 0.66 0.56 27 23172 33 13 8 12 14
RFA_00817 0.35 0.41 0.30 17 21889 43 11 28 4 24
RFA_00818 0.46 0.54 0.40 22 20246 38 13 20 5 19
SRP_00241 0.45 0.49 0.41 40 45958 60 17 41 2 42
SRP_00331 0.58 0.57 0.58 50 37589 39 3 33 3 37
SRP_00340 0.50 0.54 0.47 44 41234 52 8 42 2 38

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.