CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) IPknot
MCC 0.681 > 0.642
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.547 ± 0.131 < 0.602 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.649 > 0.625
Positive Predictive Value 0.717 > 0.661
Total TP 576 > 555
Total TN 406244 > 406207
Total FP 315 < 351
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 75
Total FP INCONS 179 < 210
Total FP COMP 88 > 66
Total FN 312 < 333
P-value 5.59469103578e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 576
Total TN 406244
Total FP 315
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 179
Total FP COMP 88
Total FN 312
Total Scores
MCC 0.681
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.547 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.649
Positive Predictive Value 0.717
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00619 - 0.37 0.41 0.34 16 22744 36 12 19 5 23
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 20 0 4 16 13
RFA_00628 0.92 0.88 0.95 76 57211 18 0 4 14 10
RFA_00630 0.83 0.80 0.86 70 56872 29 0 11 18 17
RFA_00654 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2414 1 0 1 0 18
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00817 0.77 0.78 0.76 32 21903 13 5 5 3 9
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 12 1 3 8 8
SRP_00241 0.48 0.50 0.46 41 45967 50 15 33 2 41
SRP_00331 0.69 0.69 0.70 60 37589 29 2 24 3 27
SRP_00340 0.59 0.61 0.57 50 41240 44 7 31 6 32

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 555
Total TN 406207
Total FP 351
Total FP CONTRA 75
Total FP INCONS 210
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 333
Total Scores
MCC 0.642
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.602 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.625
Positive Predictive Value 0.661
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00619 - 0.36 0.41 0.33 16 22742 43 10 23 10 23
RFA_00626 0.89 0.85 0.94 74 56537 14 0 5 9 13
RFA_00628 0.95 0.90 1.00 77 57214 14 0 0 14 9
RFA_00630 0.82 0.75 0.89 65 56880 14 0 8 6 22
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2400 15 2 13 0 18
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 2005 4 0 2 2 9
RFA_00773 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 8 1 4 3 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10
RFA_00816 0.82 0.85 0.80 35 23176 12 8 1 3 6
RFA_00817 0.23 0.24 0.22 10 21900 38 11 24 3 31
RFA_00818 0.69 0.68 0.70 28 20261 15 9 3 3 13
SRP_00241 0.57 0.60 0.54 49 45965 44 12 30 2 33
SRP_00331 0.52 0.53 0.51 46 37584 47 9 36 2 41
SRP_00340 0.54 0.57 0.51 47 41236 48 9 36 3 35

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.