CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & MXScarna(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) MXScarna(seed)
MCC 0.698 > 0.686
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.555 ± 0.136 < 0.640 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.660 < 0.662
Positive Predictive Value 0.741 > 0.712
Total TP 560 < 562
Total TN 383500 > 383467
Total FP 279 < 376
Total FP CONTRA 36 < 47
Total FP INCONS 160 < 180
Total FP COMP 83 < 149
Total FN 289 > 287
P-value 1.27663599501e-06

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 560
Total TN 383500
Total FP 279
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 160
Total FP COMP 83
Total FN 289
Total Scores
MCC 0.698
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.555 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.660
Positive Predictive Value 0.741
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 20 0 4 16 13
RFA_00628 0.92 0.88 0.95 76 57211 18 0 4 14 10
RFA_00630 0.83 0.80 0.86 70 56872 29 0 11 18 17
RFA_00654 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2414 1 0 1 0 18
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00817 0.77 0.78 0.76 32 21903 13 5 5 3 9
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 12 1 3 8 8
SRP_00241 0.48 0.50 0.46 41 45967 50 15 33 2 41
SRP_00331 0.69 0.69 0.70 60 37589 29 2 24 3 27
SRP_00340 0.59 0.61 0.57 50 41240 44 7 31 6 32

^top



Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 562
Total TN 383467
Total FP 376
Total FP CONTRA 47
Total FP INCONS 180
Total FP COMP 149
Total FN 287
Total Scores
MCC 0.686
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.662
Positive Predictive Value 0.712
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1471 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00626 0.89 0.87 0.92 76 56533 29 2 5 22 11
RFA_00628 0.85 0.81 0.89 70 57212 38 2 7 29 16
RFA_00630 0.82 0.78 0.86 68 56874 33 2 9 22 19
RFA_00654 0.73 0.67 0.80 12 2400 5 0 3 2 6
RFA_00658 0.61 0.57 0.67 8 1116 5 0 4 1 6
RFA_00664 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 978 4 0 3 1 5
RFA_00708 0.64 0.57 0.73 8 1024 4 0 3 1 6
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.57 0.56 0.59 10 1999 7 2 5 0 8
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.57 0.56 0.59 10 1936 7 2 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2000 19 2 14 3 16
RFA_00809 0.30 0.31 0.29 5 2128 12 1 11 0 11
RFA_00816 0.96 0.93 1.00 38 23182 15 0 0 15 3
RFA_00817 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 21909 12 0 0 12 5
RFA_00818 0.64 0.68 0.61 28 20255 30 11 7 12 13
SRP_00241 0.50 0.51 0.49 42 45970 54 8 36 10 40
SRP_00331 0.55 0.48 0.64 42 37609 30 1 23 6 45
SRP_00340 0.58 0.56 0.60 46 41251 43 4 27 12 36

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.