CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.699 > 0.656
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.549 ± 0.142 > 0.501 ± 0.132
Sensitivity 0.656 > 0.480
Positive Predictive Value 0.746 < 0.897
Total TP 500 > 366
Total TN 345911 < 346173
Total FP 250 > 67
Total FP CONTRA 34 > 0
Total FP INCONS 136 > 42
Total FP COMP 80 > 25
Total FN 262 < 396
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 500
Total TN 345911
Total FP 250
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 136
Total FP COMP 80
Total FN 262
Total Scores
MCC 0.699
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.549 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.656
Positive Predictive Value 0.746
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 20 0 4 16 13
RFA_00628 0.92 0.88 0.95 76 57211 18 0 4 14 10
RFA_00630 0.83 0.80 0.86 70 56872 29 0 11 18 17
RFA_00654 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2414 1 0 1 0 18
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00817 0.77 0.78 0.76 32 21903 13 5 5 3 9
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 12 1 3 8 8
SRP_00241 0.48 0.50 0.46 41 45967 50 15 33 2 41
SRP_00340 0.59 0.61 0.57 50 41240 44 7 31 6 32

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 366
Total TN 346173
Total FP 67
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 42
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 396
Total Scores
MCC 0.656
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.501 ± 0.132
Sensitivity 0.480
Positive Predictive Value 0.897
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1485 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00626 0.81 0.66 1.00 57 56559 4 0 0 4 30
RFA_00628 0.83 0.69 1.00 59 57232 8 0 0 8 27
RFA_00630 0.82 0.67 1.00 58 56895 4 0 0 4 29
RFA_00654 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 2404 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.47 0.33 0.67 6 1882 3 0 3 0 12
RFA_00768 0.41 0.28 0.63 5 1883 3 0 3 0 13
RFA_00769 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 1942 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00770 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 2005 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00773 0.41 0.28 0.63 5 1945 3 0 3 0 13
RFA_00779 0.47 0.33 0.67 6 1944 3 0 3 0 12
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.50 0.38 0.67 6 2136 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00816 0.75 0.63 0.90 26 23191 4 0 3 1 15
RFA_00817 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 21917 1 0 0 1 13
RFA_00818 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 20273 1 0 0 1 13
SRP_00241 0.51 0.33 0.79 27 46022 9 0 7 2 55
SRP_00340 0.44 0.27 0.73 22 41298 12 0 8 4 60

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.