CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.720 > 0.328
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.572 ± 0.339 > 0.445 ± 0.523
Sensitivity 0.639 > 0.402
Positive Predictive Value 0.813 > 0.272
Total TP 78 > 49
Total TN 31584 > 31500
Total FP 31 < 148
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 42
Total FP INCONS 16 < 89
Total FP COMP 13 < 17
Total FN 44 < 73
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 78
Total TN 31584
Total FP 31
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 44
Total Scores
MCC 0.720
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.572 ± 0.339
Sensitivity 0.639
Positive Predictive Value 0.813
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 12 0 0 12 0

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 49
Total TN 31500
Total FP 148
Total FP CONTRA 42
Total FP INCONS 89
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 73
Total Scores
MCC 0.328
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.445 ± 0.523
Sensitivity 0.402
Positive Predictive Value 0.272
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.94 1.00 0.88 15 1468 6 2 0 4 0
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 978 13 0 12 1 14
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0
RFA_00816 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 23133 89 30 57 2 41

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.