CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.681 > 0.478
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.547 ± 0.131 > 0.498 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.649 > 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.717 > 0.502
Total TP 576 > 406
Total TN 406244 > 406239
Total FP 315 < 463
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 90
Total FP INCONS 179 < 312
Total FP COMP 88 > 61
Total FN 312 < 482
P-value 4.94031556815e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNASLOpt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 576
Total TN 406244
Total FP 315
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 179
Total FP COMP 88
Total FN 312
Total Scores
MCC 0.681
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.547 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.649
Positive Predictive Value 0.717
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00619 - 0.37 0.41 0.34 16 22744 36 12 19 5 23
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 20 0 4 16 13
RFA_00628 0.92 0.88 0.95 76 57211 18 0 4 14 10
RFA_00630 0.83 0.80 0.86 70 56872 29 0 11 18 17
RFA_00654 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2414 1 0 1 0 18
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00817 0.77 0.78 0.76 32 21903 13 5 5 3 9
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 12 1 3 8 8
SRP_00241 0.48 0.50 0.46 41 45967 50 15 33 2 41
SRP_00331 0.69 0.69 0.70 60 37589 29 2 24 3 27
SRP_00340 0.59 0.61 0.57 50 41240 44 7 31 6 32

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 406
Total TN 406239
Total FP 463
Total FP CONTRA 90
Total FP INCONS 312
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 482
Total Scores
MCC 0.478
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.498 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.457
Positive Predictive Value 0.502
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 1476 1 0 0 1 6
RFA_00619 - 0.41 0.44 0.39 17 22747 41 8 19 14 22
RFA_00626 0.68 0.64 0.72 56 56538 30 6 16 8 31
RFA_00628 0.89 0.84 0.95 72 57215 15 0 4 11 14
RFA_00630 0.69 0.67 0.72 58 56872 32 5 18 9 29
RFA_00654 0.59 0.50 0.69 9 2402 5 1 3 1 9
RFA_00658 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 5 0 3 2 10
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00708 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 1031 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.47 0.39 0.58 7 2004 5 1 4 0 11
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10
RFA_00816 0.58 0.63 0.53 26 23171 26 13 10 3 15
RFA_00817 0.24 0.27 0.22 11 21896 42 12 26 4 30
RFA_00818 0.21 0.22 0.21 9 20258 39 14 20 5 32
SRP_00241 0.26 0.27 0.26 22 45970 66 14 50 2 60
SRP_00331 0.15 0.13 0.17 11 37612 52 1 51 0 76
SRP_00340 0.30 0.32 0.29 26 41238 64 12 52 0 56

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.