CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & RNAshapes [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) RNAshapes
MCC 0.665 > 0.491
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.534 ± 0.134 > 0.463 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.632 > 0.502
Positive Predictive Value 0.701 > 0.483
Total TP 506 > 402
Total TN 349372 > 349261
Total FP 286 < 503
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 105
Total FP INCONS 168 < 326
Total FP COMP 70 < 72
Total FN 295 < 399
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and RNAshapes. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNAshapes).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNAshapes).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and RNAshapes. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNAshapes).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 506
Total TN 349372
Total FP 286
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 168
Total FP COMP 70
Total FN 295
Total Scores
MCC 0.665
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.534 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.632
Positive Predictive Value 0.701
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00619 - 0.37 0.41 0.34 16 22744 36 12 19 5 23
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 20 0 4 16 13
RFA_00628 0.92 0.88 0.95 76 57211 18 0 4 14 10
RFA_00654 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2414 1 0 1 0 18
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00817 0.77 0.78 0.76 32 21903 13 5 5 3 9
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 12 1 3 8 8
SRP_00241 0.48 0.50 0.46 41 45967 50 15 33 2 41
SRP_00331 0.69 0.69 0.70 60 37589 29 2 24 3 27
SRP_00340 0.59 0.61 0.57 50 41240 44 7 31 6 32

^top



Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 402
Total TN 349261
Total FP 503
Total FP CONTRA 105
Total FP INCONS 326
Total FP COMP 72
Total FN 399
Total Scores
MCC 0.491
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.463 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.502
Positive Predictive Value 0.483
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00619 - 0.32 0.36 0.29 14 22742 45 9 26 10 25
RFA_00626 0.45 0.45 0.46 39 56531 61 9 37 15 48
RFA_00628 0.82 0.80 0.84 69 57209 33 1 12 20 17
RFA_00654 0.27 0.28 0.28 5 2397 13 2 11 0 13
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 7 1 6 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 4 1 0 3 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 15 2 13 0 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10
RFA_00816 0.21 0.24 0.18 10 23164 47 18 28 1 31
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21881 60 21 38 1 36
RFA_00818 0.52 0.56 0.48 23 20253 31 9 16 6 18
SRP_00241 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 45963 47 13 32 2 34
SRP_00331 0.63 0.61 0.66 53 37595 30 2 25 3 34
SRP_00340 0.54 0.57 0.51 47 41236 47 9 36 2 35

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.