CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) RNAwolf
MCC 0.681 > 0.354
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.547 ± 0.131 > 0.352 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.649 > 0.368
Positive Predictive Value 0.717 > 0.342
Total TP 576 > 327
Total TN 406244 > 406092
Total FP 315 < 786
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 142
Total FP INCONS 179 < 486
Total FP COMP 88 < 158
Total FN 312 < 561
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 576
Total TN 406244
Total FP 315
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 179
Total FP COMP 88
Total FN 312
Total Scores
MCC 0.681
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.547 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.649
Positive Predictive Value 0.717
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00619 - 0.37 0.41 0.34 16 22744 36 12 19 5 23
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 20 0 4 16 13
RFA_00628 0.92 0.88 0.95 76 57211 18 0 4 14 10
RFA_00630 0.83 0.80 0.86 70 56872 29 0 11 18 17
RFA_00654 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2414 1 0 1 0 18
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00817 0.77 0.78 0.76 32 21903 13 5 5 3 9
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 12 1 3 8 8
SRP_00241 0.48 0.50 0.46 41 45967 50 15 33 2 41
SRP_00331 0.69 0.69 0.70 60 37589 29 2 24 3 27
SRP_00340 0.59 0.61 0.57 50 41240 44 7 31 6 32

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 327
Total TN 406092
Total FP 786
Total FP CONTRA 142
Total FP INCONS 486
Total FP COMP 158
Total FN 561
Total Scores
MCC 0.354
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.352 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.368
Positive Predictive Value 0.342
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 1470 8 0 3 5 3
RFA_00619 - 0.15 0.18 0.13 7 22738 60 14 32 14 32
RFA_00626 0.08 0.09 0.08 8 56511 99 24 73 2 79
RFA_00628 0.58 0.57 0.59 49 57208 64 7 27 30 37
RFA_00630 0.48 0.47 0.49 41 56869 66 9 34 23 46
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2394 21 3 18 0 18
RFA_00658 0.56 0.50 0.64 7 1117 8 0 4 4 7
RFA_00664 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 974 16 0 16 0 14
RFA_00708 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1025 10 1 9 0 14
RFA_00767 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00768 0.50 0.44 0.57 8 1877 8 1 5 2 10
RFA_00769 0.41 0.44 0.38 8 1932 13 3 10 0 10
RFA_00770 0.51 0.50 0.53 9 1999 12 2 6 4 9
RFA_00773 0.42 0.39 0.47 7 1938 12 1 7 4 11
RFA_00779 0.26 0.28 0.26 5 1934 14 6 8 0 13
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 2 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 6 0 4 2 10
RFA_00816 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 23162 66 17 41 8 41
RFA_00817 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 57 12 41 4 41
RFA_00818 0.25 0.27 0.23 11 20253 51 12 25 14 30
SRP_00241 0.55 0.60 0.51 49 45959 61 14 34 13 33
SRP_00331 0.61 0.61 0.61 53 37588 49 3 31 15 34
SRP_00340 0.34 0.37 0.33 30 41236 75 10 52 13 52

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.