CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Vsfold4
MCC 0.681 > 0.205
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.547 ± 0.131 > 0.259 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.649 > 0.194
Positive Predictive Value 0.717 > 0.221
Total TP 576 > 172
Total TN 406244 < 406267
Total FP 315 < 664
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 113
Total FP INCONS 179 < 495
Total FP COMP 88 > 56
Total FN 312 < 716
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 576
Total TN 406244
Total FP 315
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 179
Total FP COMP 88
Total FN 312
Total Scores
MCC 0.681
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.547 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.649
Positive Predictive Value 0.717
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00619 - 0.37 0.41 0.34 16 22744 36 12 19 5 23
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 20 0 4 16 13
RFA_00628 0.92 0.88 0.95 76 57211 18 0 4 14 10
RFA_00630 0.83 0.80 0.86 70 56872 29 0 11 18 17
RFA_00654 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2414 1 0 1 0 18
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00817 0.77 0.78 0.76 32 21903 13 5 5 3 9
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 12 1 3 8 8
SRP_00241 0.48 0.50 0.46 41 45967 50 15 33 2 41
SRP_00331 0.69 0.69 0.70 60 37589 29 2 24 3 27
SRP_00340 0.59 0.61 0.57 50 41240 44 7 31 6 32

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 172
Total TN 406267
Total FP 664
Total FP CONTRA 113
Total FP INCONS 495
Total FP COMP 56
Total FN 716
Total Scores
MCC 0.205
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.259 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.194
Positive Predictive Value 0.221
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1471 3 0 0 3 1
RFA_00619 - 0.16 0.18 0.14 7 22741 48 11 32 5 32
RFA_00626 0.20 0.18 0.22 16 56543 61 11 46 4 71
RFA_00628 0.24 0.22 0.26 19 57218 64 8 46 10 67
RFA_00630 0.30 0.29 0.32 25 56875 58 3 50 5 62
RFA_00654 0.54 0.44 0.67 8 2403 5 1 3 1 10
RFA_00658 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 5 0 3 2 10
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00767 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1878 13 1 12 0 18
RFA_00768 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1875 16 1 15 0 18
RFA_00769 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 4 5 0 9
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2003 15 2 11 2 18
RFA_00773 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1936 19 1 16 2 18
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 2 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.62 0.56 0.69 9 2003 4 3 1 0 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10
RFA_00816 0.12 0.12 0.13 5 23181 42 9 25 8 36
RFA_00817 0.11 0.12 0.11 5 21898 42 16 26 0 36
RFA_00818 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 20265 46 10 26 10 41
SRP_00241 0.07 0.07 0.08 6 45978 74 13 59 2 76
SRP_00331 0.14 0.13 0.16 11 37608 56 5 51 0 76
SRP_00340 0.18 0.17 0.19 14 41256 58 11 47 0 68

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.