CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & Multilign(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) Multilign(seed)
MCC 0.757 > 0.698
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.685 ± 0.096 > 0.555 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.709 > 0.660
Positive Predictive Value 0.809 > 0.741
Total TP 602 > 560
Total TN 383512 > 383500
Total FP 235 < 279
Total FP CONTRA 36 = 36
Total FP INCONS 106 < 160
Total FP COMP 93 > 83
Total FN 247 < 289
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Multilign(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Multilign(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Multilign(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Multilign(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Multilign(seed)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 602
Total TN 383512
Total FP 235
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 106
Total FP COMP 93
Total FN 247
Total Scores
MCC 0.757
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.685 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.709
Positive Predictive Value 0.809
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00626 0.96 0.92 1.00 80 56536 7 0 0 7 7
RFA_00628 0.96 0.93 1.00 80 57211 12 0 0 12 6
RFA_00630 0.92 0.87 0.97 76 56875 17 0 2 15 11
RFA_00654 0.34 0.28 0.42 5 2403 7 0 7 0 13
RFA_00658 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1122 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00664 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 984 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00708 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1029 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00768 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00769 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 2002 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00773 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00779 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 2006 1 1 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10
RFA_00816 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 23181 6 0 0 6 2
RFA_00817 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 21906 4 0 0 4 2
RFA_00818 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 20262 3 0 0 3 2
SRP_00241 0.55 0.56 0.55 46 45972 53 9 29 15 36
SRP_00331 0.65 0.61 0.69 53 37598 34 2 22 10 34
SRP_00340 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 41249 51 6 30 15 39

^top



Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 560
Total TN 383500
Total FP 279
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 160
Total FP COMP 83
Total FN 289
Total Scores
MCC 0.698
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.555 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.660
Positive Predictive Value 0.741
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 20 0 4 16 13
RFA_00628 0.92 0.88 0.95 76 57211 18 0 4 14 10
RFA_00630 0.83 0.80 0.86 70 56872 29 0 11 18 17
RFA_00654 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2414 1 0 1 0 18
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00817 0.77 0.78 0.76 32 21903 13 5 5 3 9
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 12 1 3 8 8
SRP_00241 0.48 0.50 0.46 41 45967 50 15 33 2 41
SRP_00331 0.69 0.69 0.70 60 37589 29 2 24 3 27
SRP_00340 0.59 0.61 0.57 50 41240 44 7 31 6 32

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.