CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.599 > 0.368
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.521 ± 0.284 > 0.432 ± 0.268
Sensitivity 0.383 < 0.429
Positive Predictive Value 0.939 > 0.322
Total TP 92 < 103
Total TN 48472 > 48250
Total FP 10 < 237
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 60
Total FP INCONS 4 < 157
Total FP COMP 4 < 20
Total FN 148 > 137
P-value 9.74569091494e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 92
Total TN 48472
Total FP 10
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 4
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 148
Total Scores
MCC 0.599
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.521 ± 0.284
Sensitivity 0.383
Positive Predictive Value 0.939
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00664 0.38 0.14 1.00 2 988 1 0 0 1 12
RFA_00765 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00773 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 1 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00816 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 23183 2 0 0 2 4
SRP_00273 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6786 0 0 0 0 40
SRP_00285 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3741 0 0 0 0 30
SRP_00338 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 36

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 103
Total TN 48250
Total FP 237
Total FP CONTRA 60
Total FP INCONS 157
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 137
Total Scores
MCC 0.368
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.432 ± 0.268
Sensitivity 0.429
Positive Predictive Value 0.322
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.94 1.00 0.88 15 1468 6 2 0 4 0
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 978 13 0 12 1 14
RFA_00765 0.39 0.42 0.38 5 890 9 2 6 1 7
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0
RFA_00816 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 23133 89 30 57 2 41
SRP_00273 0.36 0.40 0.33 16 6737 34 6 27 1 24
SRP_00285 0.38 0.43 0.35 13 3704 24 6 18 0 17
SRP_00338 0.52 0.56 0.49 20 5419 22 4 17 1 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.