CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) Cylofold
MCC 0.514 > 0.503
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.393 ± 0.076 < 0.461 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.335 < 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.797 > 0.565
Total TP 412 < 560
Total TN 136155 > 135681
Total FP 125 < 507
Total FP CONTRA 30 < 53
Total FP INCONS 75 < 378
Total FP COMP 20 < 76
Total FN 818 > 670
P-value 1.80472700427e-05

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Cylofold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Cylofold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 412
Total TN 136155
Total FP 125
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 818
Total Scores
MCC 0.514
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.393 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.335
Positive Predictive Value 0.797
Nr of predictions 75

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
PDB_00213 0.76 0.59 1.00 24 5026 0 0 0 0 17
PDB_00553 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00716 0.50 0.39 0.64 9 2687 6 0 5 1 14
PDB_00810 0.42 0.18 1.00 3 1078 0 0 0 0 14
PDB_01050 0.92 0.85 1.00 11 619 2 0 0 2 2
PDB_01051 0.45 0.31 0.67 4 897 6 0 2 4 9
PDB_01152 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 551 0 0 0 0 4
RFA_00390 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1431 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00416 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 1479 1 0 0 1 9
RFA_00433 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 1425 1 0 0 1 9
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 5 0 0 5 0
RFA_00632 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 4074 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00636 0.85 0.75 0.95 21 3983 1 1 0 0 7
RFA_00642 0.58 0.39 0.88 7 2918 1 0 1 0 11
RFA_00643 0.21 0.17 0.27 3 2200 8 0 8 0 15
RFA_00644 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2691 4 1 3 0 12
RFA_00645 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2403 12 3 9 0 18
RFA_00649 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2135 4 1 3 0 12
RFA_00651 0.33 0.22 0.50 4 2072 4 1 3 0 14
RFA_00653 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2133 12 3 9 0 18
RFA_00654 0.39 0.28 0.56 5 2406 4 1 3 0 13
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00659 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00667 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 986 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00668 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00672 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00673 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00674 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00675 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00677 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00678 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 946 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00680 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00684 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 986 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00685 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00695 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00703 0.46 0.21 1.00 3 4275 0 0 0 0 11
RFA_00704 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 987 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00705 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00706 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00707 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00709 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00710 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00711 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00715 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 946 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 943 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00717 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00730 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00731 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00733 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00734 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00736 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00737 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00745 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 943 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00749 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00758 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00762 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00763 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00764 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00765 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00767 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.52 0.39 0.70 7 2006 3 3 0 0 11
RFA_00773 0.59 0.50 0.69 9 1940 4 4 0 0 9
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00781 0.85 0.72 1.00 23 5027 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00786 0.79 0.63 1.00 20 5030 0 0 0 0 12
RFA_00791 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 5131 2 0 2 0 14
RFA_00792 0.81 0.72 0.92 23 5025 2 0 2 0 9
RFA_00801 0.74 0.63 0.87 20 5027 4 0 3 1 12
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 560
Total TN 135681
Total FP 507
Total FP CONTRA 53
Total FP INCONS 378
Total FP COMP 76
Total FN 670
Total Scores
MCC 0.503
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.461 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.565
Nr of predictions 75

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
PDB_00213 0.66 0.61 0.71 25 5015 10 0 10 0 16
PDB_00553 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00716 0.68 0.70 0.67 16 2677 9 0 8 1 7
PDB_00810 0.51 0.41 0.64 7 1070 4 2 2 0 10
PDB_01050 0.92 0.85 1.00 11 619 2 0 0 2 2
PDB_01051 0.79 0.69 0.90 9 893 2 0 1 1 4
PDB_01152 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 550 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 8 0 0 8 0
RFA_00632 0.54 0.54 0.56 15 4068 12 2 10 0 13
RFA_00636 0.78 0.82 0.74 23 3974 8 7 1 0 5
RFA_00642 0.18 0.17 0.21 3 2912 11 1 10 0 15
RFA_00643 0.23 0.22 0.25 4 2195 12 1 11 0 14
RFA_00644 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2684 17 3 14 0 18
RFA_00645 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2397 18 4 14 0 18
RFA_00649 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2137 8 0 8 0 18
RFA_00651 0.30 0.28 0.33 5 2065 10 5 5 0 13
RFA_00653 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2130 15 3 12 0 18
RFA_00654 0.26 0.22 0.31 4 2402 10 1 8 1 14
RFA_00658 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 5 0 3 2 10
RFA_00659 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1118 12 0 10 2 14
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00667 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 981 10 1 8 1 14
RFA_00668 0.50 0.43 0.60 6 980 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00672 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 895 9 0 8 1 13
RFA_00673 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 1120 4 0 3 1 9
RFA_00674 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1117 11 0 11 0 14
RFA_00675 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 981 9 1 8 0 14
RFA_00677 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 978 5 0 3 2 5
RFA_00678 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 942 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00680 0.74 0.71 0.77 10 1115 6 0 3 3 4
RFA_00684 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 980 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00685 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 982 3 0 3 0 9
RFA_00695 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7010 23 4 7 12 14
RFA_00703 0.30 0.36 0.25 5 4258 19 4 11 4 9
RFA_00704 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 983 8 0 7 1 14
RFA_00705 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 1025 0 0 0 0 4
RFA_00706 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1026 9 0 9 0 14
RFA_00707 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1030 5 0 5 0 14
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00709 0.28 0.21 0.38 3 982 6 0 5 1 11
RFA_00710 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 981 9 0 9 0 14
RFA_00711 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1026 9 0 9 0 14
RFA_00715 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 939 7 0 7 0 14
RFA_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 939 7 0 7 0 14
RFA_00717 0.35 0.29 0.44 4 894 5 0 5 0 10
RFA_00730 0.51 0.42 0.63 5 895 4 1 2 1 7
RFA_00731 0.48 0.42 0.56 5 894 5 1 3 1 7
RFA_00733 0.51 0.42 0.63 5 895 4 0 3 1 7
RFA_00734 0.18 0.17 0.22 2 894 8 0 7 1 10
RFA_00736 0.48 0.42 0.56 5 894 5 1 3 1 7
RFA_00737 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 892 7 0 6 1 7
RFA_00745 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 938 8 1 7 0 12
RFA_00749 0.48 0.42 0.56 5 894 5 1 3 1 7
RFA_00758 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 898 5 0 5 0 12
RFA_00762 0.31 0.33 0.31 4 890 9 2 7 0 8
RFA_00763 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 892 7 0 6 1 7
RFA_00764 0.51 0.42 0.63 5 895 4 0 3 1 7
RFA_00765 0.51 0.42 0.63 5 895 4 0 3 1 7
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 1 1 0 0 0
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00781 0.64 0.66 0.64 21 5017 12 2 10 0 11
RFA_00786 0.33 0.31 0.36 10 5022 18 1 17 0 22
RFA_00791 0.51 0.44 0.61 14 5128 9 0 9 0 18
RFA_00792 0.78 0.72 0.85 23 5023 4 2 2 0 9
RFA_00801 0.82 0.75 0.89 24 5023 4 0 3 1 8
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.