CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & HotKnots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) HotKnots
MCC 0.537 > 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.417 ± 0.070 < 0.518 ± 0.072
Sensitivity 0.372 < 0.524
Positive Predictive Value 0.780 > 0.553
Total TP 576 < 811
Total TN 251620 > 250892
Total FP 206 < 810
Total FP CONTRA 50 < 87
Total FP INCONS 112 < 568
Total FP COMP 44 < 155
Total FN 971 > 736
P-value 1.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and HotKnots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and HotKnots).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and HotKnots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and HotKnots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and HotKnots).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 576
Total TN 251620
Total FP 206
Total FP CONTRA 50
Total FP INCONS 112
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 971
Total Scores
MCC 0.537
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.417 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.372
Positive Predictive Value 0.780
Nr of predictions 84

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
PDB_00213 0.76 0.59 1.00 24 5026 0 0 0 0 17
PDB_00553 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00716 0.50 0.39 0.64 9 2687 6 0 5 1 14
PDB_00810 0.42 0.18 1.00 3 1078 0 0 0 0 14
PDB_01050 0.92 0.85 1.00 11 619 2 0 0 2 2
PDB_01051 0.45 0.31 0.67 4 897 6 0 2 4 9
PDB_01092 0.72 0.62 0.84 32 10115 8 0 6 2 20
PDB_01152 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 551 0 0 0 0 4
RFA_00390 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1431 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00416 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 1479 1 0 0 1 9
RFA_00433 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 1425 1 0 0 1 9
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 5 0 0 5 0
RFA_00603 0.63 0.51 0.78 18 13507 8 3 2 3 17
RFA_00604 0.73 0.66 0.82 23 13502 14 4 1 9 12
RFA_00605 0.41 0.31 0.55 11 15205 11 1 8 2 24
RFA_00611 0.68 0.57 0.80 20 13016 8 3 2 3 15
RFA_00613 0.58 0.46 0.73 16 12858 6 4 2 0 19
RFA_00615 0.63 0.51 0.78 18 13343 5 3 2 0 17
RFA_00620 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 21918 15 2 8 5 22
RFA_00632 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 4074 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00636 0.85 0.75 0.95 21 3983 1 1 0 0 7
RFA_00642 0.58 0.39 0.88 7 2918 1 0 1 0 11
RFA_00643 0.21 0.17 0.27 3 2200 8 0 8 0 15
RFA_00644 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2691 4 1 3 0 12
RFA_00645 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2403 12 3 9 0 18
RFA_00649 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2135 4 1 3 0 12
RFA_00651 0.33 0.22 0.50 4 2072 4 1 3 0 14
RFA_00653 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2133 12 3 9 0 18
RFA_00654 0.39 0.28 0.56 5 2406 4 1 3 0 13
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00659 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00667 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 986 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00668 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00672 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00673 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00674 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00675 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00677 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00678 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 946 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00680 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00684 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 986 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00685 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00695 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00703 0.46 0.21 1.00 3 4275 0 0 0 0 11
RFA_00704 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 987 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00705 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00706 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00707 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00709 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00710 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00711 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00715 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 946 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 943 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00717 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00730 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00731 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00733 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00734 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00736 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00737 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00745 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 943 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00749 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00758 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00762 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00763 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00764 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00765 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00767 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.52 0.39 0.70 7 2006 3 3 0 0 11
RFA_00773 0.59 0.50 0.69 9 1940 4 4 0 0 9
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00781 0.85 0.72 1.00 23 5027 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00786 0.79 0.63 1.00 20 5030 0 0 0 0 12
RFA_00791 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 5131 2 0 2 0 14
RFA_00792 0.81 0.72 0.92 23 5025 2 0 2 0 9
RFA_00801 0.74 0.63 0.87 20 5027 4 0 3 1 12
RFA_00808 0.58 0.56 0.60 9 2001 6 0 6 0 7
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10

^top



Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 811
Total TN 250892
Total FP 810
Total FP CONTRA 87
Total FP INCONS 568
Total FP COMP 155
Total FN 736
Total Scores
MCC 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.518 ± 0.072
Sensitivity 0.524
Positive Predictive Value 0.553
Nr of predictions 84

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
PDB_00213 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 5015 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00553 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2678 24 1 22 1 23
PDB_00810 0.71 0.65 0.79 11 1067 4 0 3 1 6
PDB_01050 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 2 0 0 2 1
PDB_01051 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 892 6 0 2 4 4
PDB_01092 0.69 0.65 0.74 34 10107 13 0 12 1 18
PDB_01152 0.92 0.86 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00603 0.64 0.69 0.60 24 13490 19 4 12 3 11
RFA_00604 0.72 0.74 0.70 26 13493 22 2 9 11 9
RFA_00605 0.37 0.34 0.40 12 15195 27 3 15 9 23
RFA_00611 0.63 0.63 0.63 22 13006 15 3 10 2 13
RFA_00613 0.61 0.60 0.62 21 12846 15 4 9 2 14
RFA_00615 0.51 0.51 0.51 18 13331 17 8 9 0 17
RFA_00620 0.64 0.62 0.67 24 21909 25 3 9 13 15
RFA_00632 0.38 0.39 0.37 11 4065 19 2 17 0 17
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00642 0.16 0.17 0.17 3 2908 15 1 14 0 15
RFA_00643 0.20 0.22 0.20 4 2191 16 1 15 0 14
RFA_00644 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2676 25 6 19 0 18
RFA_00645 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2394 21 4 17 0 18
RFA_00649 0.34 0.33 0.35 6 2128 13 2 9 2 12
RFA_00651 0.35 0.33 0.38 6 2064 10 1 9 0 12
RFA_00653 0.34 0.33 0.35 6 2128 11 3 8 0 12
RFA_00654 0.27 0.28 0.28 5 2397 13 2 11 0 13
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00659 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1120 10 1 7 2 14
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00667 0.30 0.29 0.33 4 978 8 1 7 0 10
RFA_00668 0.41 0.43 0.40 6 975 9 0 9 0 8
RFA_00672 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 895 9 0 8 1 13
RFA_00673 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 1118 6 0 5 1 9
RFA_00674 0.71 0.71 0.71 10 1114 5 0 4 1 4
RFA_00675 0.29 0.29 0.31 4 977 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00677 0.42 0.43 0.43 6 976 9 0 8 1 8
RFA_00678 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 940 2 0 2 0 10
RFA_00680 0.74 0.71 0.77 10 1115 6 0 3 3 4
RFA_00684 0.66 0.64 0.69 9 977 5 0 4 1 5
RFA_00685 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 980 6 0 5 1 9
RFA_00695 0.56 0.50 0.64 7 7010 29 1 3 25 7
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00704 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 976 14 2 12 0 14
RFA_00705 0.69 0.71 0.67 10 1020 5 0 5 0 4
RFA_00706 0.29 0.29 0.31 4 1022 10 0 9 1 10
RFA_00707 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1026 9 3 6 0 14
RFA_00708 0.30 0.29 0.33 4 1023 10 0 8 2 10
RFA_00709 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 981 10 0 9 1 14
RFA_00710 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 981 9 0 9 0 14
RFA_00711 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1026 10 0 9 1 14
RFA_00715 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 936 10 0 10 0 14
RFA_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 935 11 0 11 0 14
RFA_00717 0.64 0.64 0.64 9 889 5 0 5 0 5
RFA_00730 0.69 0.67 0.73 8 892 4 1 2 1 4
RFA_00731 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00733 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00734 0.61 0.67 0.57 8 889 7 1 5 1 4
RFA_00736 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00737 0.75 0.75 0.75 9 891 5 0 3 2 3
RFA_00745 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 934 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00749 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00758 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 893 3 1 2 0 5
RFA_00762 0.64 0.67 0.62 8 890 5 1 4 0 4
RFA_00763 0.75 0.75 0.75 9 891 4 0 3 1 3
RFA_00764 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00765 0.75 0.75 0.75 9 891 5 0 3 2 3
RFA_00767 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1870 3 3 0 0 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1934 21 0 19 2 18
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1999 20 0 17 3 18
RFA_00773 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1934 22 0 19 3 18
RFA_00779 0.87 0.94 0.81 17 1932 4 3 1 0 1
RFA_00781 0.58 0.59 0.58 19 5017 14 2 12 0 13
RFA_00786 0.71 0.72 0.70 23 5017 10 2 8 0 9
RFA_00791 0.35 0.34 0.35 11 5120 20 5 15 0 21
RFA_00792 0.94 0.94 0.94 30 5018 4 0 2 2 2
RFA_00801 0.85 0.81 0.90 26 5021 4 0 3 1 6
RFA_00808 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 2000 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.