CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(20) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(20) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.704 > 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.665 ± 0.126 > 0.289 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.524 > 0.224
Positive Predictive Value 0.948 > 0.923
Total TP 363 > 155
Total TN 132883 < 133098
Total FP 36 > 29
Total FP CONTRA 0 = 0
Total FP INCONS 20 > 13
Total FP COMP 16 = 16
Total FN 330 < 538
P-value 4.85839946686e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(20) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(20) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 363
Total TN 132883
Total FP 36
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 20
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 330
Total Scores
MCC 0.704
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.665 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.524
Positive Predictive Value 0.948
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00390 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1417 3 0 0 3 1
RFA_00416 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1471 2 0 0 2 1
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00749 0.75 0.75 0.75 9 891 4 0 3 1 3
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00765 0.75 0.75 0.75 9 891 4 0 3 1 3
SPR_00277 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 0
SPR_00721 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 0
SPR_01157 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 2754 0 0 0 0 0
SRP_00020 0.72 0.52 1.00 17 5548 0 0 0 0 16
SRP_00058 0.66 0.44 1.00 15 5763 0 0 0 0 19
SRP_00084 0.45 0.21 1.00 7 5453 0 0 0 0 27
SRP_00105 0.45 0.21 1.00 7 5558 0 0 0 0 27
SRP_00134 0.67 0.66 0.68 19 5967 13 0 9 4 10
SRP_00141 0.38 0.15 1.00 6 6322 1 0 0 1 35
SRP_00182 0.89 0.83 0.94 84 45967 7 0 5 2 17
SRP_00231 0.59 0.35 1.00 12 5448 0 0 0 0 22
SRP_00273 0.84 0.70 1.00 28 6758 0 0 0 0 12
SRP_00274 0.54 0.29 1.00 11 6892 0 0 0 0 27
SRP_00338 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 5453 0 0 0 0 29
SRP_00341 0.47 0.23 1.00 7 4746 0 0 0 0 24
SRP_00357 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 5349 0 0 0 0 29

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 155
Total TN 133098
Total FP 29
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 538
Total Scores
MCC 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.289 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.224
Positive Predictive Value 0.923
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00658 0.38 0.14 1.00 2 1126 1 0 0 1 12
RFA_00664 0.38 0.14 1.00 2 988 1 0 0 1 12
RFA_00749 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00764 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00765 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
SPR_00277 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 21
SPR_00721 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 21
SPR_01157 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 21
SRP_00020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5565 0 0 0 0 33
SRP_00058 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5778 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00084 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00105 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5565 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00134 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5995 0 0 0 0 29
SRP_00141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6328 0 0 0 0 41
SRP_00182 0.85 0.78 0.92 79 45970 17 0 7 10 22
SRP_00231 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00273 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6786 0 0 0 0 40
SRP_00274 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6903 0 0 0 0 38
SRP_00338 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 36
SRP_00341 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 31
SRP_00357 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5356 0 0 0 0 36

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.