CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Alterna
MCC 0.720 > 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.728 ± 0.113 > 0.563 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.663 > 0.520
Positive Predictive Value 0.786 > 0.581
Total TP 265 > 208
Total TN 49572 > 49551
Total FP 117 < 212
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 23
Total FP INCONS 59 < 127
Total FP COMP 45 < 62
Total FN 135 < 192
P-value 4.77766983502e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Alterna).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Alterna).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Alterna).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 265
Total TN 49572
Total FP 117
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 59
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 135
Total Scores
MCC 0.720
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.728 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.663
Positive Predictive Value 0.786
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 208
Total TN 49551
Total FP 212
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 127
Total FP COMP 62
Total FN 192
Total Scores
MCC 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.563 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.520
Positive Predictive Value 0.581
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00636 0.50 0.46 0.54 13 3981 13 3 8 2 15
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2399 16 2 14 0 18
RFA_00658 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 1116 5 0 3 2 5
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 10 0 10 0 14
RFA_00703 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 4266 16 1 2 13 5
RFA_00708 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1025 4 0 3 1 7
RFA_00749 0.41 0.42 0.42 5 891 8 3 4 1 7
RFA_00764 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 892 7 1 5 1 7
RFA_00765 0.81 0.67 1.00 8 895 2 0 0 2 4
RFA_00767 0.54 0.50 0.60 9 1876 6 2 4 0 9
RFA_00768 0.50 0.44 0.57 8 1877 9 0 6 3 10
RFA_00769 0.38 0.39 0.39 7 1935 11 2 9 0 11
RFA_00770 0.45 0.39 0.54 7 2003 9 0 6 3 11
RFA_00773 0.45 0.39 0.54 7 1940 9 0 6 3 11
RFA_00779 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1999 19 3 14 2 16
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 11 0 9 2 10
SRP_00137 0.36 0.40 0.33 10 4156 22 3 17 2 15
SRP_00285 0.77 0.73 0.81 22 3714 6 0 5 1 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.