CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) CentroidFold
MCC 0.791 > 0.711
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059 > 0.703 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.762 > 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.822 > 0.743
Total TP 1598 > 1429
Total TN 900807 < 900829
Total FP 543 < 660
Total FP CONTRA 62 < 113
Total FP INCONS 285 < 381
Total FP COMP 196 > 166
Total FN 499 < 668
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1598
Total TN 900807
Total FP 543
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 285
Total FP COMP 196
Total FN 499
Total Scores
MCC 0.791
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.762
Positive Predictive Value 0.822
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1429
Total TN 900829
Total FP 660
Total FP CONTRA 113
Total FP INCONS 381
Total FP COMP 166
Total FN 668
Total Scores
MCC 0.711
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.703 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.743
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.65 0.65 0.65 42 27196 23 7 16 0 23
CRW_01535 0.82 0.78 0.85 29 7106 7 0 5 2 8
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 8 0 0 8 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.86 0.95 75 56537 20 0 4 16 12
RFA_00627 0.87 0.82 0.93 71 56877 18 0 5 13 16
RFA_00628 0.90 0.86 0.94 74 57212 20 0 5 15 12
RFA_00630 0.80 0.76 0.85 66 56875 25 0 12 13 21
RFA_00636 0.64 0.64 0.64 18 3977 10 4 6 0 10
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2401 14 2 12 0 18
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 981 10 0 9 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 19 1 3 15 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 0.83 0.83 0.83 10 891 4 0 2 2 2
RFA_00764 0.83 0.83 0.83 10 891 4 0 2 2 2
RFA_00765 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 4 0 2 2 3
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.45 0.44 0.47 8 1874 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00769 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 2005 4 0 2 2 9
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 3 1 0 2 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00805 0.80 0.64 1.00 96 133290 0 0 0 0 54
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.43 0.38 0.50 6 2133 6 0 6 0 10
RFA_00814 0.70 0.51 0.95 21 25178 6 0 1 5 20
RFA_00816 0.75 0.73 0.77 30 23181 14 8 1 5 11
RFA_00817 0.13 0.12 0.14 5 21909 31 9 22 0 36
RFA_00818 0.54 0.54 0.54 22 20260 26 11 8 7 19
RFA_00819 0.49 0.37 0.65 15 27943 23 0 8 15 26
SRP_00084 0.78 0.79 0.77 27 5425 8 1 7 0 7
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.74 0.84 0.66 21 4154 11 4 7 0 4
SRP_00146 0.82 0.83 0.81 30 5216 7 1 6 0 6
SRP_00200 0.79 0.81 0.78 29 6866 9 1 7 1 7
SRP_00231 0.90 0.91 0.89 31 5425 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00241 0.52 0.55 0.49 45 45964 49 14 33 2 37
SRP_00257 0.85 0.82 0.87 89 50938 18 0 13 5 19
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.69 0.67 0.71 59 36232 27 5 19 3 29
SRP_00328 0.60 0.61 0.58 52 39532 40 10 27 3 33
SRP_00329 0.62 0.61 0.63 52 39821 35 5 25 5 33
SRP_00331 0.53 0.53 0.53 46 37589 43 8 32 3 41
SRP_00338 0.97 0.97 0.97 35 5424 1 0 1 0 1
SRP_00340 0.51 0.55 0.47 45 41233 52 11 39 2 37
SRP_00357 0.96 0.97 0.95 35 5319 3 1 1 1 1
SRP_00367 0.96 0.97 0.94 34 6750 2 1 1 0 1

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.