CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.785 > 0.762
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.782 ± 0.060 > 0.759 ± 0.057
Sensitivity 0.758 > 0.686
Positive Predictive Value 0.814 < 0.848
Total TP 1475 > 1335
Total TN 767553 < 767791
Total FP 530 > 353
Total FP CONTRA 62 > 51
Total FP INCONS 276 > 189
Total FP COMP 192 > 113
Total FN 472 < 612
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1475
Total TN 767553
Total FP 530
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 276
Total FP COMP 192
Total FN 472
Total Scores
MCC 0.785
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.782 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.758
Positive Predictive Value 0.814
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1335
Total TN 767791
Total FP 353
Total FP CONTRA 51
Total FP INCONS 189
Total FP COMP 113
Total FN 612
Total Scores
MCC 0.762
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.759 ± 0.057
Sensitivity 0.686
Positive Predictive Value 0.848
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.79 0.69 0.90 45 27211 5 0 5 0 20
CRW_01535 0.79 0.78 0.81 29 7104 12 0 7 5 8
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 15 0 0 15 0
RFA_00626 0.85 0.79 0.92 69 56541 13 1 5 7 18
RFA_00627 0.86 0.75 0.98 65 56887 13 0 1 12 22
RFA_00628 0.86 0.78 0.94 67 57220 7 1 3 3 19
RFA_00630 0.87 0.83 0.92 72 56875 10 1 5 4 15
RFA_00636 0.64 0.64 0.64 18 3977 10 3 7 0 10
RFA_00654 0.62 0.39 1.00 7 2408 0 0 0 0 11
RFA_00658 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 1116 5 0 3 2 5
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 983 7 0 7 0 14
RFA_00703 0.43 0.43 0.43 6 4264 21 1 7 13 8
RFA_00708 0.64 0.57 0.73 8 1024 3 0 3 0 6
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.66 0.44 1.00 8 1883 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00768 0.66 0.44 1.00 8 1883 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.58 0.39 0.88 7 2008 1 0 1 0 11
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10
RFA_00814 0.96 0.93 1.00 38 25162 6 0 0 6 3
RFA_00816 0.80 0.63 1.00 26 23194 1 0 0 1 15
RFA_00817 0.68 0.59 0.80 24 21915 9 2 4 3 17
RFA_00818 0.57 0.54 0.61 22 20265 18 8 6 4 19
RFA_00819 0.95 0.93 0.97 38 27927 15 0 1 14 3
SRP_00084 0.90 0.91 0.89 31 5425 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00134 0.65 0.66 0.66 19 5966 13 0 10 3 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.89 0.86 0.91 31 5219 3 1 2 0 5
SRP_00200 0.81 0.78 0.85 28 6870 5 1 4 0 8
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00241 0.65 0.51 0.82 42 46005 10 0 9 1 40
SRP_00257 0.83 0.74 0.93 80 50954 8 3 3 2 28
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.56 0.34 0.91 30 36282 3 0 3 0 58
SRP_00328 0.67 0.66 0.69 56 39540 29 7 18 4 29
SRP_00329 0.64 0.61 0.68 52 39826 28 4 21 3 33
SRP_00331 0.60 0.53 0.69 46 37608 21 1 20 0 41
SRP_00338 0.96 0.94 0.97 34 5425 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00340 0.61 0.39 0.97 32 41295 1 0 1 0 50
SRP_00357 0.90 0.86 0.94 31 5323 3 1 1 1 5
SRP_00367 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 6755 2 1 1 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.