CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Contrafold
MCC 0.791 > 0.704
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059 > 0.700 ± 0.068
Sensitivity 0.762 > 0.703
Positive Predictive Value 0.822 > 0.706
Total TP 1598 > 1475
Total TN 900807 > 900664
Total FP 543 < 851
Total FP CONTRA 62 < 133
Total FP INCONS 285 < 480
Total FP COMP 196 < 238
Total FN 499 < 622
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Contrafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Contrafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1598
Total TN 900807
Total FP 543
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 285
Total FP COMP 196
Total FN 499
Total Scores
MCC 0.791
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.762
Positive Predictive Value 0.822
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1475
Total TN 900664
Total FP 851
Total FP CONTRA 133
Total FP INCONS 480
Total FP COMP 238
Total FN 622
Total Scores
MCC 0.704
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.700 ± 0.068
Sensitivity 0.703
Positive Predictive Value 0.706
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.58 0.60 0.57 39 27192 31 7 23 1 26
CRW_01535 0.82 0.78 0.85 29 7106 9 0 5 4 8
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 10 0 0 10 0
RFA_00626 0.91 0.87 0.94 76 56535 26 1 4 21 11
RFA_00627 0.86 0.83 0.89 72 56872 28 0 9 19 15
RFA_00628 0.91 0.88 0.94 76 57210 25 0 5 20 10
RFA_00630 0.77 0.77 0.77 67 56866 34 6 14 14 20
RFA_00636 0.60 0.64 0.56 18 3973 14 4 10 0 10
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2400 15 2 13 0 18
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 19 1 3 15 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 0.83 0.83 0.83 10 891 4 0 2 2 2
RFA_00764 0.83 0.83 0.83 10 891 4 0 2 2 2
RFA_00765 0.83 0.83 0.83 10 891 4 0 2 2 2
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00768 0.45 0.44 0.47 8 1874 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 4 1 0 3 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00805 0.83 0.74 0.93 111 133266 19 1 8 10 39
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 0 8 0 10
RFA_00814 0.79 0.78 0.80 32 25160 19 1 7 11 9
RFA_00816 0.72 0.73 0.71 30 23178 20 8 4 8 11
RFA_00817 0.11 0.12 0.10 5 21893 47 12 35 0 36
RFA_00818 0.57 0.61 0.53 25 20254 32 11 11 10 16
RFA_00819 0.46 0.46 0.45 19 27924 47 3 20 24 22
SRP_00084 0.78 0.79 0.77 27 5425 8 1 7 0 7
SRP_00134 0.64 0.69 0.59 20 5961 19 3 11 5 9
SRP_00137 0.74 0.84 0.66 21 4154 13 4 7 2 4
SRP_00146 0.82 0.83 0.81 30 5216 8 1 6 1 6
SRP_00200 0.79 0.81 0.78 29 6866 10 1 7 2 7
SRP_00231 0.90 0.91 0.89 31 5425 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00241 0.51 0.55 0.47 45 45961 53 14 36 3 37
SRP_00257 0.86 0.85 0.88 92 50935 22 0 13 9 16
SRP_00285 0.97 0.97 0.97 29 3711 1 0 1 0 1
SRP_00308 0.66 0.68 0.64 60 36221 37 6 28 3 28
SRP_00328 0.60 0.62 0.58 53 39530 41 10 28 3 32
SRP_00329 0.59 0.61 0.58 52 39813 43 6 32 5 33
SRP_00331 0.52 0.54 0.50 47 37581 50 10 37 3 40
SRP_00338 0.97 0.97 0.97 35 5424 2 0 1 1 1
SRP_00340 0.51 0.56 0.47 46 41230 56 11 41 4 36
SRP_00357 0.96 0.97 0.95 35 5319 3 1 1 1 1
SRP_00367 0.96 0.97 0.94 34 6750 3 1 1 1 1

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.