CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Cylofold
MCC 0.800 > 0.653
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.772 ± 0.089 > 0.671 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.770 > 0.626
Positive Predictive Value 0.833 > 0.686
Total TP 537 > 436
Total TN 101061 < 101070
Total FP 160 < 245
Total FP CONTRA 22 < 34
Total FP INCONS 86 < 166
Total FP COMP 52 > 45
Total FN 160 < 261
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Cylofold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Cylofold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 537
Total TN 101061
Total FP 160
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 86
Total FP COMP 52
Total FN 160
Total Scores
MCC 0.800
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.772 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.770
Positive Predictive Value 0.833
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 436
Total TN 101070
Total FP 245
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 166
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 261
Total Scores
MCC 0.653
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.626
Positive Predictive Value 0.686
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.40 0.38 0.42 14 7107 21 2 17 2 23
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 8 0 0 8 0
RFA_00636 0.78 0.82 0.74 23 3974 8 7 1 0 5
RFA_00654 0.26 0.22 0.31 4 2402 10 1 8 1 14
RFA_00658 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 5 0 3 2 10
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.30 0.36 0.25 5 4258 19 4 11 4 9
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 0.48 0.42 0.56 5 894 5 1 3 1 7
RFA_00764 0.51 0.42 0.63 5 895 4 0 3 1 7
RFA_00765 0.51 0.42 0.63 5 895 4 0 3 1 7
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 1 1 0 0 0
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3
SRP_00084 0.59 0.59 0.61 20 5427 13 3 10 0 14
SRP_00134 0.43 0.45 0.42 13 5964 22 4 14 4 16
SRP_00137 0.59 0.52 0.68 13 4167 6 2 4 0 12
SRP_00146 0.33 0.33 0.34 12 5218 23 4 19 0 24
SRP_00200 0.61 0.56 0.67 20 6873 10 1 9 0 16
SRP_00231 0.62 0.59 0.67 20 5430 10 2 8 0 14
SRP_00285 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 3715 0 0 0 0 4
SRP_00338 0.61 0.56 0.67 20 5430 10 0 10 0 16
SRP_00357 0.46 0.44 0.48 16 5323 17 1 16 0 20
SRP_00367 0.69 0.69 0.71 24 6752 10 0 10 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.