CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) IPknot
MCC 0.791 > 0.726
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059 > 0.737 ± 0.068
Sensitivity 0.762 > 0.705
Positive Predictive Value 0.822 > 0.750
Total TP 1598 > 1478
Total TN 900807 > 900781
Total FP 543 < 648
Total FP CONTRA 62 < 117
Total FP INCONS 285 < 376
Total FP COMP 196 > 155
Total FN 499 < 619
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1598
Total TN 900807
Total FP 543
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 285
Total FP COMP 196
Total FN 499
Total Scores
MCC 0.791
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.762
Positive Predictive Value 0.822
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1478
Total TN 900781
Total FP 648
Total FP CONTRA 117
Total FP INCONS 376
Total FP COMP 155
Total FN 619
Total Scores
MCC 0.726
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.737 ± 0.068
Sensitivity 0.705
Positive Predictive Value 0.750
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.58 0.58 0.58 38 27195 30 7 21 2 27
CRW_01535 0.82 0.78 0.85 29 7106 7 0 5 2 8
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 8 0 0 8 0
RFA_00626 0.89 0.85 0.94 74 56537 14 0 5 9 13
RFA_00627 0.69 0.66 0.73 57 56875 35 4 17 14 30
RFA_00628 0.95 0.90 1.00 77 57214 14 0 0 14 9
RFA_00630 0.82 0.75 0.89 65 56880 14 0 8 6 22
RFA_00636 0.65 0.64 0.67 18 3978 9 3 6 0 10
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2400 15 2 13 0 18
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.44 0.43 0.46 6 4265 19 1 6 12 8
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 2005 4 0 2 2 9
RFA_00773 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 8 1 4 3 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00805 0.65 0.55 0.75 83 133276 35 1 26 8 67
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10
RFA_00814 0.89 0.88 0.90 36 25160 11 0 4 7 5
RFA_00816 0.82 0.85 0.80 35 23176 12 8 1 3 6
RFA_00817 0.23 0.24 0.22 10 21900 38 11 24 3 31
RFA_00818 0.69 0.68 0.70 28 20261 15 9 3 3 13
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 26 0 1 25 2
SRP_00084 0.90 0.91 0.89 31 5425 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.74 0.84 0.66 21 4154 11 4 7 0 4
SRP_00146 0.87 0.83 0.91 30 5220 3 1 2 0 6
SRP_00200 0.79 0.81 0.78 29 6866 8 1 7 0 7
SRP_00231 0.93 0.94 0.91 32 5425 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00241 0.57 0.60 0.54 49 45965 44 12 30 2 33
SRP_00257 0.83 0.81 0.85 88 50937 17 4 11 2 20
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.74 0.68 0.81 60 36241 15 6 8 1 28
SRP_00328 0.65 0.65 0.66 55 39538 29 8 20 1 30
SRP_00329 0.63 0.61 0.65 52 39823 31 5 23 3 33
SRP_00331 0.52 0.53 0.51 46 37584 47 9 36 2 41
SRP_00338 0.97 0.97 0.97 35 5424 1 0 1 0 1
SRP_00340 0.54 0.57 0.51 47 41236 48 9 36 3 35
SRP_00357 0.96 0.97 0.95 35 5319 2 1 1 0 1
SRP_00367 0.83 0.86 0.81 30 6749 7 1 6 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.