CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & MXScarna(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) MXScarna(seed)
MCC 0.791 > 0.734
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059 > 0.737 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.762 > 0.698
Positive Predictive Value 0.822 > 0.773
Total TP 1598 > 1464
Total TN 900807 < 900857
Total FP 543 < 743
Total FP CONTRA 62 < 75
Total FP INCONS 285 < 356
Total FP COMP 196 < 312
Total FN 499 < 633
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1598
Total TN 900807
Total FP 543
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 285
Total FP COMP 196
Total FN 499
Total Scores
MCC 0.791
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.762
Positive Predictive Value 0.822
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1464
Total TN 900857
Total FP 743
Total FP CONTRA 75
Total FP INCONS 356
Total FP COMP 312
Total FN 633
Total Scores
MCC 0.734
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.737 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.698
Positive Predictive Value 0.773
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.69 0.54 0.90 35 27222 5 0 4 1 30
CRW_01535 0.89 0.89 0.89 33 7103 8 0 4 4 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1417 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00416 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1471 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 19 0 0 19 0
RFA_00626 0.89 0.87 0.92 76 56533 29 2 5 22 11
RFA_00627 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 36 1 9 26 18
RFA_00628 0.85 0.81 0.89 70 57212 38 2 7 29 16
RFA_00630 0.82 0.78 0.86 68 56874 33 2 9 22 19
RFA_00636 0.35 0.36 0.36 10 3977 18 2 16 0 18
RFA_00654 0.73 0.67 0.80 12 2400 5 0 3 2 6
RFA_00658 0.61 0.57 0.67 8 1116 5 0 4 1 6
RFA_00664 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 978 4 0 3 1 5
RFA_00703 0.62 0.57 0.67 8 4266 8 1 3 4 6
RFA_00708 0.64 0.57 0.73 8 1024 4 0 3 1 6
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.57 0.56 0.59 10 1999 7 2 5 0 8
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.57 0.56 0.59 10 1936 7 2 5 0 8
RFA_00805 0.78 0.72 0.84 108 133257 31 1 20 10 42
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2000 19 2 14 3 16
RFA_00809 0.30 0.31 0.29 5 2128 12 1 11 0 11
RFA_00814 0.95 0.93 0.97 38 25161 22 0 1 21 3
RFA_00816 0.96 0.93 1.00 38 23182 15 0 0 15 3
RFA_00817 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 21909 12 0 0 12 5
RFA_00818 0.64 0.68 0.61 28 20255 30 11 7 12 13
RFA_00819 0.94 0.90 0.97 37 27928 26 0 1 25 4
SRP_00084 0.93 0.94 0.91 32 5425 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00134 0.65 0.69 0.63 20 5963 14 2 10 2 9
SRP_00137 0.60 0.64 0.57 16 4158 13 3 9 1 9
SRP_00146 0.82 0.75 0.90 27 5223 5 1 2 2 9
SRP_00200 0.72 0.67 0.77 24 6872 10 1 6 3 12
SRP_00231 0.90 0.91 0.89 31 5425 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00241 0.50 0.51 0.49 42 45970 54 8 36 10 40
SRP_00257 0.62 0.55 0.69 59 50955 29 4 22 3 49
SRP_00285 0.86 0.80 0.92 24 3715 3 0 2 1 6
SRP_00308 0.82 0.73 0.91 64 36245 15 0 6 9 24
SRP_00328 0.64 0.60 0.69 51 39547 31 4 19 8 34
SRP_00329 0.63 0.60 0.65 51 39825 35 4 23 8 34
SRP_00331 0.55 0.48 0.64 42 37609 30 1 23 6 45
SRP_00338 0.75 0.72 0.79 26 5427 8 0 7 1 10
SRP_00340 0.58 0.56 0.60 46 41251 43 4 27 12 36
SRP_00357 0.85 0.81 0.91 29 5324 5 1 2 2 7
SRP_00367 0.72 0.66 0.79 23 6757 11 1 5 5 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.