CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & McQFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) McQFold
MCC 0.791 > 0.516
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059 > 0.585 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.762 > 0.503
Positive Predictive Value 0.822 > 0.531
Total TP 1598 > 1054
Total TN 900807 > 900767
Total FP 543 < 1056
Total FP CONTRA 62 < 178
Total FP INCONS 285 < 753
Total FP COMP 196 > 125
Total FN 499 < 1043
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and McQFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and McQFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and McQFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and McQFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and McQFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1598
Total TN 900807
Total FP 543
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 285
Total FP COMP 196
Total FN 499
Total Scores
MCC 0.791
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.762
Positive Predictive Value 0.822
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1054
Total TN 900767
Total FP 1056
Total FP CONTRA 178
Total FP INCONS 753
Total FP COMP 125
Total FN 1043
Total Scores
MCC 0.516
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.585 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.503
Positive Predictive Value 0.531
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.57 0.55 0.58 36 27199 28 6 20 2 29
CRW_01535 0.38 0.38 0.38 14 7103 24 3 20 1 23
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 8 0 0 8 0
RFA_00626 0.21 0.22 0.21 19 56526 76 15 56 5 68
RFA_00627 0.42 0.40 0.44 35 56873 47 13 32 2 52
RFA_00628 0.42 0.41 0.43 35 57209 50 7 40 3 51
RFA_00630 0.63 0.63 0.63 55 56865 41 6 27 8 32
RFA_00636 0.73 0.71 0.74 20 3978 7 5 2 0 8
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2403 12 2 10 0 18
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.44 0.43 0.46 6 4265 19 1 6 12 8
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00749 0.48 0.42 0.56 5 894 5 1 3 1 7
RFA_00764 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 892 7 1 5 1 7
RFA_00765 0.51 0.42 0.63 5 895 4 0 3 1 7
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.85 0.94 0.77 17 1931 5 4 1 0 1
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 4 0 0 4 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 5 1 0 4 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00805 0.56 0.52 0.60 78 133256 57 3 49 5 72
RFA_00808 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 2000 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3
RFA_00814 0.79 0.80 0.77 33 25157 21 0 10 11 8
RFA_00816 0.82 0.85 0.80 35 23176 12 4 5 3 6
RFA_00817 0.35 0.39 0.31 16 21894 39 9 26 4 25
RFA_00818 0.28 0.27 0.29 11 20263 30 12 15 3 30
RFA_00819 0.30 0.29 0.31 12 27927 50 4 23 23 29
SRP_00084 0.65 0.56 0.76 19 5435 6 2 4 0 15
SRP_00134 0.16 0.17 0.16 5 5964 29 6 20 3 24
SRP_00137 0.37 0.40 0.36 10 4158 18 7 11 0 15
SRP_00146 0.37 0.33 0.41 12 5224 17 2 15 0 24
SRP_00200 0.87 0.78 0.97 28 6874 1 0 1 0 8
SRP_00231 0.62 0.59 0.67 20 5430 10 2 8 0 14
SRP_00241 0.30 0.30 0.29 25 45971 62 12 48 2 57
SRP_00257 0.44 0.40 0.49 43 50953 45 7 37 1 65
SRP_00285 0.38 0.37 0.41 11 3714 16 1 15 0 19
SRP_00308 0.45 0.42 0.48 37 36238 40 5 35 0 51
SRP_00328 0.49 0.49 0.49 42 39536 43 10 33 0 43
SRP_00329 0.38 0.38 0.40 32 39822 50 8 41 1 53
SRP_00331 0.50 0.47 0.53 41 37598 36 4 32 0 46
SRP_00338 0.75 0.75 0.75 27 5424 9 3 6 0 9
SRP_00340 0.48 0.50 0.46 41 41238 51 9 40 2 41
SRP_00357 0.46 0.47 0.46 17 5319 20 3 17 0 19
SRP_00367 0.45 0.43 0.47 15 6754 17 0 17 0 20

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.