CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & PETfold_pre2.0(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) PETfold_pre2.0(20)
MCC 0.858 > 0.605
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.863 ± 0.119 > 0.640 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.851 > 0.395
Positive Predictive Value 0.867 < 0.929
Total TP 422 > 196
Total TN 98819 < 99095
Total FP 99 > 40
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 0
Total FP INCONS 55 > 15
Total FP COMP 34 > 25
Total FN 74 < 300
P-value 4.00488379386e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 422
Total TN 98819
Total FP 99
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 55
Total FP COMP 34
Total FN 74
Total Scores
MCC 0.858
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.863 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.851
Positive Predictive Value 0.867
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 196
Total TN 99095
Total FP 40
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 15
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 300
Total Scores
MCC 0.605
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.395
Positive Predictive Value 0.929
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.99 0.97 1.00 36 7104 3 0 0 3 1
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00390 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1417 2 0 0 2 1
RFA_00416 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1471 2 0 0 2 1
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 4836 9 0 1 8 1
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1126 3 0 2 1 14
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 986 4 0 4 0 14
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 0 0 0 0 0
SRP_00084 0.45 0.21 1.00 7 5453 0 0 0 0 27
SRP_00134 0.41 0.28 0.62 8 5982 6 0 5 1 21
SRP_00200 0.41 0.17 1.00 6 6897 1 0 0 1 30
SRP_00231 0.42 0.21 0.88 7 5452 1 0 1 0 27
SRP_00308 0.34 0.14 0.86 12 36301 2 0 2 0 76
SRP_00338 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 5453 0 0 0 0 29
SRP_00357 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 5349 0 0 0 0 29
SRP_00367 0.41 0.17 1.00 6 6780 1 0 0 1 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.