CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
MCC 0.795 > 0.751
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.788 ± 0.061 > 0.747 ± 0.058
Sensitivity 0.765 > 0.685
Positive Predictive Value 0.828 > 0.823
Total TP 1514 > 1357
Total TN 858614 < 858794
Total FP 505 > 481
Total FP CONTRA 57 < 61
Total FP INCONS 257 > 230
Total FP COMP 191 > 190
Total FN 466 < 623
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(seed)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1514
Total TN 858614
Total FP 505
Total FP CONTRA 57
Total FP INCONS 257
Total FP COMP 191
Total FN 466
Total Scores
MCC 0.795
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.788 ± 0.061
Sensitivity 0.765
Positive Predictive Value 0.828
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1357
Total TN 858794
Total FP 481
Total FP CONTRA 61
Total FP INCONS 230
Total FP COMP 190
Total FN 623
Total Scores
MCC 0.751
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.058
Sensitivity 0.685
Positive Predictive Value 0.823
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.68 0.65 0.71 42 27202 24 2 15 7 23
CRW_01535 0.96 0.95 0.97 35 7104 4 0 1 3 2
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 5 0 0 5 0
RFA_00626 0.96 0.92 1.00 80 56536 7 0 0 7 7
RFA_00627 0.96 0.93 1.00 81 56872 12 0 0 12 6
RFA_00628 0.96 0.93 1.00 80 57211 12 0 0 12 6
RFA_00630 0.92 0.87 0.97 76 56875 17 0 2 15 11
RFA_00636 0.73 0.68 0.79 19 3981 5 2 3 0 9
RFA_00654 0.34 0.28 0.42 5 2403 7 0 7 0 13
RFA_00658 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1122 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00664 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 984 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00703 0.44 0.29 0.67 4 4272 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00708 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1029 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00768 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00769 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 2002 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00773 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00779 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00805 0.64 0.49 0.84 73 133299 16 0 14 2 77
RFA_00808 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 2006 1 1 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10
RFA_00814 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 25161 5 0 0 5 2
RFA_00816 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 23181 6 0 0 6 2
RFA_00817 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 21906 4 0 0 4 2
RFA_00818 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 20262 3 0 0 3 2
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 6 0 0 6 2
SRP_00084 0.73 0.62 0.88 21 5436 4 1 2 1 13
SRP_00137 0.51 0.48 0.55 12 4164 12 3 7 2 13
SRP_00146 0.69 0.56 0.87 20 5230 5 1 2 2 16
SRP_00200 0.69 0.53 0.90 19 6882 6 1 1 4 17
SRP_00231 0.73 0.62 0.88 21 5436 4 1 2 1 13
SRP_00241 0.55 0.56 0.55 46 45972 53 9 29 15 36
SRP_00257 0.53 0.48 0.58 52 50950 42 5 33 4 56
SRP_00285 0.77 0.63 0.95 19 3721 4 0 1 3 11
SRP_00328 0.61 0.59 0.64 50 39543 34 5 23 6 35
SRP_00329 0.75 0.72 0.78 61 39825 29 2 15 12 24
SRP_00331 0.65 0.61 0.69 53 37598 34 2 22 10 34
SRP_00338 0.76 0.61 0.96 22 5437 3 0 1 2 14
SRP_00340 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 41249 51 6 30 15 39
SRP_00357 0.71 0.56 0.91 20 5334 5 1 1 3 16
SRP_00367 0.68 0.51 0.90 18 6766 7 1 1 5 17

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.