CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & PknotsRG [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) PknotsRG
MCC 0.791 > 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059 > 0.730 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.762 > 0.688
Positive Predictive Value 0.822 > 0.674
Total TP 1598 > 1442
Total TN 900807 > 900613
Total FP 543 < 922
Total FP CONTRA 62 < 147
Total FP INCONS 285 < 550
Total FP COMP 196 < 225
Total FN 499 < 655
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and PknotsRG. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PknotsRG).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PknotsRG).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and PknotsRG. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PknotsRG).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1598
Total TN 900807
Total FP 543
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 285
Total FP COMP 196
Total FN 499
Total Scores
MCC 0.791
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.762
Positive Predictive Value 0.822
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1442
Total TN 900613
Total FP 922
Total FP CONTRA 147
Total FP INCONS 550
Total FP COMP 225
Total FN 655
Total Scores
MCC 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.730 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.688
Positive Predictive Value 0.674
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.59 0.60 0.59 39 27195 28 6 21 1 26
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 4 0 0 4 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00626 0.89 0.86 0.93 75 56535 28 2 4 22 12
RFA_00627 0.73 0.70 0.76 61 56873 35 4 15 16 26
RFA_00628 0.78 0.74 0.81 64 57212 40 0 15 25 22
RFA_00630 0.60 0.60 0.60 52 56866 44 8 27 9 35
RFA_00636 0.95 0.96 0.93 27 3976 4 2 0 2 1
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2398 17 2 15 0 18
RFA_00658 0.33 0.29 0.40 4 1118 8 0 6 2 10
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.35 0.29 0.44 4 1026 6 0 5 1 10
RFA_00749 0.69 0.67 0.73 8 892 4 1 2 1 4
RFA_00764 0.69 0.67 0.73 8 892 4 1 2 1 4
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00769 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 3 1 0 2 0
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 2 0 0 2 1
RFA_00805 0.56 0.55 0.56 83 133238 77 6 59 12 67
RFA_00808 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 2000 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3
RFA_00814 0.91 0.95 0.87 39 25155 23 4 2 17 2
RFA_00816 0.68 0.73 0.63 30 23172 26 12 6 8 11
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21885 56 16 39 1 36
RFA_00818 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 20245 56 20 36 0 41
RFA_00819 0.79 0.80 0.79 33 27924 34 0 9 25 8
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.51 0.55 0.48 16 5962 23 3 14 6 13
SRP_00137 0.74 0.84 0.66 21 4154 13 4 7 2 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.71 0.72 0.70 26 6866 13 1 10 2 10
SRP_00231 0.90 0.91 0.89 31 5425 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00241 0.54 0.59 0.50 48 45960 50 12 36 2 34
SRP_00257 0.85 0.86 0.84 93 50929 20 4 14 2 15
SRP_00285 0.98 0.97 1.00 29 3712 0 0 0 0 1
SRP_00308 0.07 0.07 0.07 6 36227 82 11 71 0 82
SRP_00328 0.69 0.71 0.68 60 39533 31 7 21 3 25
SRP_00329 0.75 0.74 0.75 63 39819 24 3 18 3 22
SRP_00331 0.64 0.63 0.65 55 37590 33 2 28 3 32
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.54 0.57 0.52 47 41237 46 8 36 2 35
SRP_00357 0.90 0.89 0.91 32 5321 3 1 2 0 4
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.