CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) ProbKnot
MCC 0.791 > 0.684
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059 > 0.686 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.762 > 0.691
Positive Predictive Value 0.822 > 0.678
Total TP 1598 > 1449
Total TN 900807 > 900614
Total FP 543 < 926
Total FP CONTRA 62 < 160
Total FP INCONS 285 < 529
Total FP COMP 196 < 237
Total FN 499 < 648
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and ProbKnot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and ProbKnot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1598
Total TN 900807
Total FP 543
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 285
Total FP COMP 196
Total FN 499
Total Scores
MCC 0.791
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.762
Positive Predictive Value 0.822
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1449
Total TN 900614
Total FP 926
Total FP CONTRA 160
Total FP INCONS 529
Total FP COMP 237
Total FN 648
Total Scores
MCC 0.684
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.686 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.691
Positive Predictive Value 0.678
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.64 0.66 0.62 43 27192 28 6 20 2 22
CRW_01535 0.91 0.84 1.00 31 7109 2 0 0 2 6
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00626 0.86 0.80 0.91 70 56539 32 1 6 25 17
RFA_00627 0.69 0.69 0.68 60 56865 47 6 22 19 27
RFA_00628 0.90 0.88 0.93 76 57209 31 1 5 25 10
RFA_00630 0.69 0.66 0.72 57 56874 41 4 18 19 30
RFA_00636 0.44 0.46 0.43 13 3975 17 0 17 0 15
RFA_00654 0.23 0.22 0.25 4 2399 12 2 10 0 14
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.64 0.64 0.64 9 4264 17 1 4 12 5
RFA_00708 0.33 0.29 0.40 4 1025 6 0 6 0 10
RFA_00749 0.81 0.67 1.00 8 895 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00764 0.81 0.67 1.00 8 895 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00765 0.81 0.67 1.00 8 895 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.44 0.44 0.44 8 1873 11 1 9 1 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 2000 9 0 6 3 8
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00805 0.73 0.72 0.73 108 133239 49 5 34 10 42
RFA_00808 0.65 0.56 0.75 9 2004 3 0 3 0 7
RFA_00809 0.35 0.38 0.33 6 2127 12 1 11 0 10
RFA_00814 0.32 0.37 0.28 15 25146 45 8 31 6 26
RFA_00816 0.80 0.88 0.73 36 23171 20 9 4 7 5
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21883 57 18 39 0 36
RFA_00818 0.48 0.54 0.43 22 20250 38 13 16 9 19
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 34 0 1 33 2
SRP_00084 0.87 0.88 0.86 30 5425 5 1 4 0 4
SRP_00134 0.55 0.55 0.55 16 5966 17 3 10 4 13
SRP_00137 0.74 0.84 0.66 21 4154 11 4 7 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.80 0.78 0.82 28 6869 7 1 5 1 8
SRP_00231 0.87 0.88 0.86 30 5425 6 1 4 1 4
SRP_00241 0.44 0.48 0.41 39 45960 60 17 40 3 43
SRP_00257 0.86 0.86 0.86 93 50932 18 5 10 3 15
SRP_00285 0.98 0.97 1.00 29 3712 0 0 0 0 1
SRP_00308 0.73 0.75 0.71 66 36222 30 4 23 3 22
SRP_00328 0.62 0.65 0.59 55 39528 43 10 28 5 30
SRP_00329 0.57 0.58 0.56 49 39816 43 8 30 5 36
SRP_00331 0.54 0.54 0.55 47 37589 42 7 32 3 40
SRP_00338 0.97 0.97 0.97 35 5424 1 0 1 0 1
SRP_00340 0.51 0.55 0.47 45 41232 53 10 41 2 37
SRP_00357 0.96 0.97 0.95 35 5319 4 1 1 2 1
SRP_00367 0.96 0.97 0.94 34 6750 3 1 1 1 1

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.