CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RNAalifold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RNAalifold(20)
MCC 0.858 > 0.622
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.863 ± 0.119 > 0.641 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.851 > 0.435
Positive Predictive Value 0.867 < 0.893
Total TP 422 > 216
Total TN 98819 < 99064
Total FP 99 > 44
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 4
Total FP INCONS 55 > 22
Total FP COMP 34 > 18
Total FN 74 < 280
P-value 3.33194562506e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RNAalifold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAalifold(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAalifold(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RNAalifold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAalifold(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 422
Total TN 98819
Total FP 99
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 55
Total FP COMP 34
Total FN 74
Total Scores
MCC 0.858
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.863 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.851
Positive Predictive Value 0.867
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 216
Total TN 99064
Total FP 44
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 280
Total Scores
MCC 0.622
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.641 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.435
Positive Predictive Value 0.893
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.89 0.81 0.97 30 7109 4 0 1 3 7
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00390 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1417 3 0 0 3 1
RFA_00416 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1471 2 0 0 2 1
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 4837 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00749 0.75 0.75 0.75 9 891 4 0 3 1 3
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00765 0.75 0.75 0.75 9 891 4 0 3 1 3
SRP_00084 0.45 0.21 1.00 7 5453 0 0 0 0 27
SRP_00134 0.67 0.66 0.68 19 5967 13 0 9 4 10
SRP_00200 0.41 0.17 1.00 6 6897 0 0 0 0 30
SRP_00231 0.59 0.35 1.00 12 5448 0 0 0 0 22
SRP_00308 0.48 0.32 0.74 28 36277 10 4 6 0 60
SRP_00338 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 5453 0 0 0 0 29
SRP_00357 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 5349 0 0 0 0 29
SRP_00367 0.41 0.17 1.00 6 6780 0 0 0 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.