CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RNAfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RNAfold
MCC 0.791 > 0.688
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059 > 0.676 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.762 > 0.693
Positive Predictive Value 0.822 > 0.685
Total TP 1598 > 1453
Total TN 900807 > 900632
Total FP 543 < 899
Total FP CONTRA 62 < 143
Total FP INCONS 285 < 524
Total FP COMP 196 < 232
Total FN 499 < 644
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RNAfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RNAfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAfold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1598
Total TN 900807
Total FP 543
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 285
Total FP COMP 196
Total FN 499
Total Scores
MCC 0.791
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.762
Positive Predictive Value 0.822
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of RNAfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1453
Total TN 900632
Total FP 899
Total FP CONTRA 143
Total FP INCONS 524
Total FP COMP 232
Total FN 644
Total Scores
MCC 0.688
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.676 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.693
Positive Predictive Value 0.685
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.59 0.60 0.59 39 27195 28 6 21 1 26
CRW_01535 0.84 0.78 0.91 29 7108 8 0 3 5 8
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00626 0.96 0.92 1.00 80 56536 25 0 0 25 7
RFA_00627 0.72 0.69 0.75 60 56873 35 4 16 15 27
RFA_00628 0.93 0.91 0.96 78 57210 29 0 3 26 8
RFA_00630 0.66 0.66 0.66 57 56867 40 6 23 11 30
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.27 0.28 0.28 5 2397 13 2 11 0 13
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00764 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00765 0.75 0.75 0.75 9 891 5 0 3 2 3
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 7 1 6 0 10
RFA_00769 0.52 0.56 0.50 10 1933 10 4 6 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 2 6 0 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00805 0.55 0.55 0.56 83 133237 71 6 60 5 67
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 18 2 13 3 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10
RFA_00814 0.79 0.80 0.77 33 25157 26 4 6 16 8
RFA_00816 0.59 0.66 0.53 27 23169 32 13 11 8 14
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21885 55 16 39 0 36
RFA_00818 0.59 0.63 0.55 26 20254 31 10 11 10 15
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 31 0 1 30 2
SRP_00084 0.85 0.85 0.85 29 5426 5 1 4 0 5
SRP_00134 0.51 0.55 0.48 16 5962 23 3 14 6 13
SRP_00137 0.74 0.84 0.66 21 4154 13 4 7 2 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.84 0.86 0.82 31 6865 9 1 6 2 5
SRP_00231 0.87 0.88 0.86 30 5425 5 1 4 0 4
SRP_00241 0.54 0.59 0.51 48 45961 49 11 36 2 34
SRP_00257 0.86 0.87 0.85 94 50929 19 4 13 2 14
SRP_00285 0.91 0.87 0.96 26 3714 1 0 1 0 4
SRP_00308 0.58 0.58 0.59 51 36228 39 9 27 3 37
SRP_00328 0.64 0.66 0.63 56 39532 38 8 25 5 29
SRP_00329 0.75 0.74 0.75 63 39819 24 3 18 3 22
SRP_00331 0.66 0.66 0.66 57 37589 32 2 27 3 30
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 41236 46 8 36 2 34
SRP_00357 0.93 0.92 0.94 33 5321 3 1 1 1 3
SRP_00367 0.96 0.97 0.94 34 6750 2 1 1 0 1

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.