CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RNAshapes [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RNAshapes
MCC 0.782 > 0.643
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.781 ± 0.062 > 0.652 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.756 > 0.647
Positive Predictive Value 0.811 > 0.642
Total TP 1406 > 1203
Total TN 710679 > 710539
Total FP 508 < 850
Total FP CONTRA 62 < 145
Total FP INCONS 266 < 526
Total FP COMP 180 > 179
Total FN 454 < 657
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RNAshapes. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAshapes).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAshapes).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RNAshapes. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAshapes).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1406
Total TN 710679
Total FP 508
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 266
Total FP COMP 180
Total FN 454
Total Scores
MCC 0.782
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.781 ± 0.062
Sensitivity 0.756
Positive Predictive Value 0.811
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1203
Total TN 710539
Total FP 850
Total FP CONTRA 145
Total FP INCONS 526
Total FP COMP 179
Total FN 657
Total Scores
MCC 0.643
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.652 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.647
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.55 0.55 0.55 36 27196 29 5 24 0 29
CRW_01535 0.93 0.86 1.00 32 7108 3 0 0 3 5
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00626 0.45 0.45 0.46 39 56531 61 9 37 15 48
RFA_00627 0.63 0.61 0.66 53 56873 42 4 23 15 34
RFA_00628 0.82 0.80 0.84 69 57209 33 1 12 20 17
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.27 0.28 0.28 5 2397 13 2 11 0 13
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 0.69 0.67 0.73 8 892 4 1 2 1 4
RFA_00764 0.69 0.67 0.73 8 892 4 1 2 1 4
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 7 1 6 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 4 1 0 3 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 15 2 13 0 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10
RFA_00814 0.62 0.63 0.60 26 25157 26 6 11 9 15
RFA_00816 0.21 0.24 0.18 10 23164 47 18 28 1 31
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21881 60 21 38 1 36
RFA_00818 0.52 0.56 0.48 23 20253 31 9 16 6 18
RFA_00819 0.84 0.80 0.87 33 27928 36 0 5 31 8
SRP_00084 0.87 0.88 0.86 30 5425 5 1 4 0 4
SRP_00134 0.51 0.55 0.48 16 5962 23 3 14 6 13
SRP_00137 0.74 0.84 0.66 21 4154 13 4 7 2 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.66 0.67 0.65 24 6866 15 1 12 2 12
SRP_00231 0.87 0.88 0.86 30 5425 5 1 4 0 4
SRP_00241 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 45963 47 13 32 2 34
SRP_00257 0.86 0.83 0.88 90 50938 17 1 11 5 18
SRP_00285 0.98 0.97 1.00 29 3712 0 0 0 0 1
SRP_00308 0.57 0.56 0.58 49 36231 37 3 32 2 39
SRP_00328 0.64 0.65 0.63 55 39533 38 8 25 5 30
SRP_00329 0.67 0.66 0.67 56 39820 28 4 23 1 29
SRP_00331 0.63 0.61 0.66 53 37595 30 2 25 3 34
SRP_00338 0.97 0.97 0.97 35 5424 1 0 1 0 1
SRP_00340 0.54 0.57 0.51 47 41236 47 9 36 2 35
SRP_00357 0.96 0.97 0.95 35 5319 2 1 1 0 1
SRP_00367 0.83 0.86 0.81 30 6749 7 1 6 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.