CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RNAsubopt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RNAsubopt
MCC 0.785 > 0.640
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.782 ± 0.060 > 0.656 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.758 > 0.647
Positive Predictive Value 0.814 > 0.636
Total TP 1475 > 1259
Total TN 767553 > 767385
Total FP 530 < 942
Total FP CONTRA 62 < 157
Total FP INCONS 276 < 565
Total FP COMP 192 < 220
Total FN 472 < 688
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RNAsubopt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAsubopt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAsubopt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RNAsubopt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAsubopt).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1475
Total TN 767553
Total FP 530
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 276
Total FP COMP 192
Total FN 472
Total Scores
MCC 0.785
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.782 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.758
Positive Predictive Value 0.814
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1259
Total TN 767385
Total FP 942
Total FP CONTRA 157
Total FP INCONS 565
Total FP COMP 220
Total FN 688
Total Scores
MCC 0.640
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.656 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.647
Positive Predictive Value 0.636
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.47 0.48 0.47 31 27195 36 7 28 1 34
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 4 0 0 4 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 12 0 0 12 0
RFA_00626 0.68 0.66 0.70 57 56535 42 6 18 18 30
RFA_00627 0.72 0.68 0.77 59 56876 33 4 14 15 28
RFA_00628 0.89 0.86 0.91 74 57210 32 2 5 25 12
RFA_00630 0.58 0.60 0.57 52 56861 51 12 28 11 35
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.27 0.28 0.28 5 2397 13 2 11 0 13
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00764 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 7 1 6 0 10
RFA_00769 0.52 0.56 0.50 10 1933 10 4 6 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 5 1 1 3 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 18 2 13 3 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10
RFA_00814 0.39 0.39 0.39 16 25159 40 5 20 15 25
RFA_00816 0.74 0.78 0.70 32 23174 24 8 6 10 9
RFA_00817 0.35 0.41 0.30 17 21889 43 11 28 4 24
RFA_00818 0.47 0.54 0.41 22 20247 39 13 19 7 19
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 31 0 1 30 2
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.51 0.55 0.48 16 5962 23 3 14 6 13
SRP_00137 0.74 0.84 0.66 21 4154 13 4 7 2 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.81 0.83 0.79 30 6865 10 1 7 2 6
SRP_00231 0.90 0.91 0.89 31 5425 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00241 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 45963 48 12 33 3 34
SRP_00257 0.80 0.81 0.79 87 50930 26 4 19 3 21
SRP_00285 0.91 0.87 0.96 26 3714 1 0 1 0 4
SRP_00308 0.06 0.07 0.06 6 36221 88 12 76 0 82
SRP_00328 0.64 0.66 0.63 56 39532 38 8 25 5 29
SRP_00329 0.61 0.62 0.60 53 39814 37 10 26 1 32
SRP_00331 0.55 0.55 0.55 48 37587 43 3 37 3 39
SRP_00338 0.92 0.92 0.92 33 5424 3 0 3 0 3
SRP_00340 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 41235 48 8 37 3 34
SRP_00357 0.90 0.89 0.91 32 5321 4 1 2 1 4
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.