CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RNAwolf
MCC 0.791 > 0.422
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059 > 0.457 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.762 > 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.822 > 0.414
Total TP 1598 > 909
Total TN 900807 > 900557
Total FP 543 < 1648
Total FP CONTRA 62 < 249
Total FP INCONS 285 < 1037
Total FP COMP 196 < 362
Total FN 499 < 1188
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1598
Total TN 900807
Total FP 543
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 285
Total FP COMP 196
Total FN 499
Total Scores
MCC 0.791
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.762
Positive Predictive Value 0.822
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 909
Total TN 900557
Total FP 1648
Total FP CONTRA 249
Total FP INCONS 1037
Total FP COMP 362
Total FN 1188
Total Scores
MCC 0.422
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.457 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.414
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.62 0.63 0.61 41 27194 39 9 17 13 24
CRW_01535 0.14 0.16 0.13 6 7095 39 8 31 0 31
PDB_00012 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 400 2 0 0 2 1
RFA_00390 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 1419 5 0 2 3 5
RFA_00416 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 1470 8 0 3 5 3
RFA_00433 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 1418 7 2 1 4 5
RFA_00587 0.93 0.87 1.00 13 4838 16 0 0 16 2
RFA_00626 0.08 0.09 0.08 8 56511 99 24 73 2 79
RFA_00627 0.38 0.39 0.37 34 56862 73 13 44 16 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.57 0.59 49 57208 64 7 27 30 37
RFA_00630 0.48 0.47 0.49 41 56869 66 9 34 23 46
RFA_00636 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 3978 19 1 15 3 17
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2394 21 3 18 0 18
RFA_00658 0.56 0.50 0.64 7 1117 8 0 4 4 7
RFA_00664 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 974 16 0 16 0 14
RFA_00703 0.39 0.43 0.35 6 4261 25 6 5 14 8
RFA_00708 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1025 10 1 9 0 14
RFA_00749 0.55 0.58 0.54 7 890 9 1 5 3 5
RFA_00764 0.48 0.42 0.56 5 894 6 0 4 2 7
RFA_00765 0.36 0.42 0.33 5 888 13 0 10 3 7
RFA_00767 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00768 0.50 0.44 0.57 8 1877 8 1 5 2 10
RFA_00769 0.41 0.44 0.38 8 1932 13 3 10 0 10
RFA_00770 0.51 0.50 0.53 9 1999 12 2 6 4 9
RFA_00773 0.42 0.39 0.47 7 1938 12 1 7 4 11
RFA_00779 0.26 0.28 0.26 5 1934 14 6 8 0 13
RFA_00805 0.30 0.31 0.29 47 133225 121 13 101 7 103
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 2 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 6 0 4 2 10
RFA_00814 0.20 0.22 0.18 9 25149 62 12 30 20 32
RFA_00816 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 23162 66 17 41 8 41
RFA_00817 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 57 12 41 4 41
RFA_00818 0.25 0.27 0.23 11 20253 51 12 25 14 30
RFA_00819 0.16 0.17 0.16 7 27921 70 6 32 32 34
SRP_00084 0.75 0.76 0.74 26 5425 15 1 8 6 8
SRP_00134 0.71 0.76 0.67 22 5962 19 3 8 8 7
SRP_00137 0.35 0.40 0.31 10 4154 22 7 15 0 15
SRP_00146 0.24 0.22 0.28 8 5224 21 1 20 0 28
SRP_00200 0.34 0.33 0.35 12 6869 30 0 22 8 24
SRP_00231 0.64 0.65 0.65 22 5426 15 1 11 3 12
SRP_00241 0.55 0.60 0.51 49 45959 61 14 34 13 33
SRP_00257 0.68 0.69 0.67 75 50928 49 5 32 12 33
SRP_00285 0.61 0.53 0.70 16 3718 12 0 7 5 14
SRP_00308 0.27 0.26 0.27 23 36231 62 13 48 1 65
SRP_00328 0.32 0.33 0.31 28 39530 68 12 51 5 57
SRP_00329 0.31 0.33 0.30 28 39810 75 5 60 10 57
SRP_00331 0.61 0.61 0.61 53 37588 49 3 31 15 34
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 9 0 2 7 2
SRP_00340 0.34 0.37 0.33 30 41236 75 10 52 13 52
SRP_00357 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5320 8 1 1 6 2
SRP_00367 0.96 0.97 0.94 34 6750 11 1 1 9 1

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.