CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.858 > 0.758
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.863 ± 0.119 > 0.795 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.851 > 0.651
Positive Predictive Value 0.867 < 0.885
Total TP 422 > 323
Total TN 98819 < 98941
Total FP 99 > 66
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 4
Total FP INCONS 55 > 38
Total FP COMP 34 > 24
Total FN 74 < 173
P-value 1.08932646657e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 422
Total TN 98819
Total FP 99
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 55
Total FP COMP 34
Total FN 74
Total Scores
MCC 0.858
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.863 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.851
Positive Predictive Value 0.867
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.94 0.89 1.00 33 7107 3 0 0 3 4
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 323
Total TN 98941
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 173
Total Scores
MCC 0.758
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.795 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.651
Positive Predictive Value 0.885
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01535 0.80 0.65 1.00 24 7116 2 0 0 2 13
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00416 0.87 0.87 0.87 13 1470 5 0 2 3 2
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 7 0 0 7 0
RFA_00658 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 1116 4 0 3 1 5
RFA_00664 0.64 0.57 0.73 8 979 4 0 3 1 6
RFA_00749 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00764 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00765 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
SRP_00084 0.84 0.74 0.96 25 5434 1 0 1 0 9
SRP_00134 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 5968 8 0 7 1 9
SRP_00200 0.82 0.69 0.96 25 6877 2 0 1 1 11
SRP_00231 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 5429 0 0 0 0 3
SRP_00308 0.62 0.52 0.73 46 36252 17 1 16 0 42
SRP_00338 0.56 0.36 0.87 13 5445 2 0 2 0 23
SRP_00357 0.87 0.75 1.00 27 5329 0 0 0 0 9
SRP_00367 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6780 6 3 3 0 35

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.