CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.788 > 0.495
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.780 ± 0.060 > 0.507 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.760 > 0.378
Positive Predictive Value 0.819 > 0.650
Total TP 1565 > 779
Total TN 893700 < 894413
Total FP 540 > 520
Total FP CONTRA 62 > 61
Total FP INCONS 285 < 359
Total FP COMP 193 > 100
Total FN 495 < 1281
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1565
Total TN 893700
Total FP 540
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 285
Total FP COMP 193
Total FN 495
Total Scores
MCC 0.788
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.780 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.760
Positive Predictive Value 0.819
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 11 0 0 11 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00654 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2405 5 1 3 1 12
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00084 0.88 0.88 0.88 30 5426 4 1 3 0 4
SRP_00134 0.61 0.66 0.58 19 5962 18 3 11 4 10
SRP_00137 0.75 0.84 0.68 21 4155 10 4 6 0 4
SRP_00146 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5216 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00200 0.90 0.92 0.89 33 6866 4 1 3 0 3
SRP_00231 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 5426 3 1 2 0 3
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00285 0.95 0.93 0.97 28 3712 1 0 1 0 2
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00338 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 5424 2 0 2 0 2
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32
SRP_00357 0.93 0.94 0.92 34 5319 3 1 2 0 2
SRP_00367 0.93 0.94 0.92 33 6750 3 1 2 0 2

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 779
Total TN 894413
Total FP 520
Total FP CONTRA 61
Total FP INCONS 359
Total FP COMP 100
Total FN 1281
Total Scores
MCC 0.495
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.378
Positive Predictive Value 0.650
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27261 0 0 0 0 65
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00390 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 1425 1 0 0 1 9
RFA_00416 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 1479 1 0 0 1 9
RFA_00433 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 1425 1 0 0 1 9
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00626 0.90 0.80 1.00 70 56546 12 0 0 12 17
RFA_00627 0.90 0.82 0.99 71 56881 11 0 1 10 16
RFA_00628 0.89 0.81 0.97 70 57219 12 0 2 10 16
RFA_00630 0.85 0.75 0.97 65 56886 11 0 2 9 22
RFA_00636 0.62 0.54 0.71 15 3984 6 3 3 0 13
RFA_00654 0.35 0.28 0.45 5 2404 6 0 6 0 13
RFA_00658 0.64 0.57 0.73 8 1117 4 0 3 1 6
RFA_00664 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 980 4 0 3 1 7
RFA_00703 0.54 0.36 0.83 5 4272 1 0 1 0 9
RFA_00708 0.75 0.57 1.00 8 1027 1 0 0 1 6
RFA_00749 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 1 0 0 1 2
RFA_00764 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 1 0 0 1 2
RFA_00765 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 1 0 0 1 2
RFA_00767 0.19 0.17 0.23 3 1878 10 3 7 0 15
RFA_00768 0.19 0.17 0.23 3 1878 10 3 7 0 15
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 4 2 0 8
RFA_00770 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1997 9 6 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 6 3 0 9
RFA_00779 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 6 3 0 9
RFA_00805 0.27 0.24 0.30 36 133267 84 12 71 1 114
RFA_00808 0.60 0.50 0.73 8 2005 4 0 3 1 8
RFA_00809 0.37 0.31 0.45 5 2134 7 0 6 1 11
RFA_00814 0.90 0.85 0.95 35 25163 11 0 2 9 6
RFA_00816 0.90 0.85 0.95 35 23183 8 0 2 6 6
RFA_00817 0.88 0.83 0.94 34 21909 7 0 2 5 7
RFA_00818 0.80 0.71 0.91 29 20269 10 0 3 7 12
RFA_00819 0.90 0.85 0.95 35 27929 13 0 2 11 6
SRP_00084 0.34 0.21 0.58 7 5448 5 1 4 0 27
SRP_00134 0.65 0.66 0.66 19 5966 11 0 10 1 10
SRP_00137 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4178 8 1 7 0 25
SRP_00146 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5246 7 1 6 0 36
SRP_00200 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6888 15 1 14 0 36
SRP_00231 0.46 0.29 0.71 10 5446 4 0 4 0 24
SRP_00241 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46025 31 2 29 0 82
SRP_00257 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 51009 31 2 29 0 108
SRP_00285 0.33 0.20 0.55 6 3730 5 0 5 0 24
SRP_00308 0.62 0.55 0.72 48 36248 19 4 15 0 40
SRP_00328 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 39594 27 2 25 0 85
SRP_00329 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 39885 18 1 17 0 85
SRP_00331 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 37656 19 2 17 0 87
SRP_00338 0.51 0.33 0.80 12 5445 4 0 3 1 24
SRP_00340 0.21 0.13 0.34 11 41296 23 1 20 2 71
SRP_00357 0.46 0.31 0.69 11 5340 5 0 5 0 25
SRP_00367 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6774 12 0 12 0 35

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.