CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold NanoFolder
MCC 0.550 > 0.320
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.568 ± 0.085 > 0.382 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.536 > 0.361
Positive Predictive Value 0.570 > 0.293
Total TP 831 > 559
Total TN 215337 > 214887
Total FP 731 < 1427
Total FP CONTRA 78 < 223
Total FP INCONS 548 < 1125
Total FP COMP 105 > 79
Total FN 718 < 990
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 831
Total TN 215337
Total FP 731
Total FP CONTRA 78
Total FP INCONS 548
Total FP COMP 105
Total FN 718
Total Scores
MCC 0.550
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.568 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.536
Positive Predictive Value 0.570
Nr of predictions 72

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01539 0.81 0.76 0.88 28 7108 10 0 4 6 9
CRW_01563 0.57 0.51 0.63 19 6873 12 2 9 1 18
CRW_01583 0.79 0.76 0.82 28 7106 10 0 6 4 9
CRW_01590 0.21 0.22 0.21 8 7102 30 6 24 0 29
CRW_01603 0.82 0.78 0.85 29 7106 8 0 5 3 8
PDB_00011 - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 266 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00017 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 694 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00036 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3461 27 1 24 2 27
PDB_00113 - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 223 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_00119 - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 244 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_00136 - 0.76 0.73 0.79 19 2391 7 0 5 2 7
PDB_00160 - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_00178 - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 519 1 0 0 1 2
PDB_00221 - 0.88 0.78 1.00 7 246 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00312 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 426 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00341 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 691 12 0 12 0 16
PDB_00349 - 0.64 0.64 0.64 9 932 5 0 5 0 5
PDB_00417 - 0.10 0.11 0.11 6 14141 49 6 43 0 50
PDB_00527 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 297 6 0 3 3 5
PDB_00565 - 0.77 0.70 0.85 35 8087 7 0 6 1 15
PDB_00570 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2257 21 2 19 0 22
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3302 20 5 14 1 25
PDB_00573 - 0.40 0.41 0.39 14 6634 24 4 18 2 20
PDB_00584 - 0.47 0.41 0.54 7 1472 6 0 6 0 10
PDB_00725 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 583 2 0 2 0 5
PDB_00734 - 0.83 0.70 1.00 7 224 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00823 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 185 5 0 5 0 9
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00890 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 689 14 2 12 0 14
PDB_01009 0.52 0.57 0.48 12 2460 13 5 8 0 9
PDB_01051 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 892 6 0 2 4 4
PDB_01074 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2746 29 3 26 0 25
PDB_01130 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1746 24 6 18 0 20
PDB_01199 - 0.18 0.17 0.22 4 2127 14 0 14 0 20
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00434 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00436 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00442 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00446 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 1471 3 0 0 3 1
RFA_00604 0.72 0.74 0.70 26 13493 24 2 9 13 9
RFA_00664 0.07 0.07 0.09 1 979 11 0 10 1 13
RFA_00674 0.69 0.71 0.67 10 1113 6 0 5 1 4
RFA_00675 0.29 0.29 0.31 4 977 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00677 0.42 0.43 0.43 6 976 9 0 8 1 8
RFA_00684 0.66 0.64 0.69 9 977 5 0 4 1 5
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00716 0.06 0.07 0.08 1 933 12 0 12 0 13
RFA_00717 0.64 0.64 0.64 9 889 5 0 5 0 5
RFA_00730 0.69 0.67 0.73 8 892 4 1 2 1 4
RFA_00763 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 6 0 2 4 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 5 1 0 4 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 16 2 13 1 16
SPR_00030 - 0.47 0.43 0.53 9 2468 8 0 8 0 12
SPR_00331 0.32 0.35 0.30 7 2752 16 5 11 0 13
SPR_00333 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2753 22 6 16 0 21
SPR_00509 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 2907 3 0 0 3 1
SPR_00512 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 2907 3 0 0 3 1
SPR_00557 0.40 0.43 0.39 9 2827 15 1 13 1 12
SRP_00005 - 0.28 0.29 0.27 7 3979 21 4 15 2 17
SRP_00038 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5019 31 2 29 0 33
SRP_00193 - 0.67 0.67 0.69 24 6868 12 1 10 1 12
SRP_00200 0.44 0.44 0.43 16 6866 21 2 19 0 20
SRP_00216 0.93 0.93 0.93 25 3376 3 1 1 1 2
SRP_00233 0.91 0.88 0.94 29 5120 2 0 2 0 4
SRP_00243 0.90 0.87 0.93 27 5122 3 0 2 1 4
SRP_00273 0.86 0.88 0.85 35 6745 8 1 5 2 5
SRP_00303 0.60 0.63 0.59 20 6636 14 1 13 0 12
SRP_00338 0.92 0.92 0.92 33 5424 4 0 3 1 3
SRP_00342 0.57 0.60 0.56 15 3978 17 1 11 5 10
SRP_00383 0.12 0.13 0.13 3 3216 21 3 18 0 21

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 559
Total TN 214887
Total FP 1427
Total FP CONTRA 223
Total FP INCONS 1125
Total FP COMP 79
Total FN 990
Total Scores
MCC 0.320
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.382 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.361
Positive Predictive Value 0.293
Nr of predictions 72

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_01539 0.10 0.11 0.10 4 7099 40 1 36 3 33
CRW_01563 0.11 0.14 0.11 5 6856 43 5 37 1 32
CRW_01583 0.36 0.41 0.33 15 7095 31 8 22 1 22
CRW_01590 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 7093 50 7 40 3 37
CRW_01603 0.41 0.46 0.38 17 7095 29 6 22 1 20
PDB_00011 - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 265 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_00017 - 0.66 0.67 0.67 10 688 5 1 4 0 5
PDB_00036 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3457 29 1 28 0 27
PDB_00113 - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 223 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_00119 - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 244 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_00136 - 0.70 0.73 0.68 19 2387 9 1 8 0 7
PDB_00160 - 0.89 0.89 0.89 8 267 2 0 1 1 1
PDB_00178 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 1 10 0 11
PDB_00221 - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 245 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_00312 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 426 1 0 0 1 0
PDB_00341 - 0.47 0.44 0.54 7 690 6 0 6 0 9
PDB_00349 - 0.10 0.14 0.10 2 926 18 0 18 0 12
PDB_00417 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14138 58 2 56 0 56
PDB_00527 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 292 8 2 6 0 5
PDB_00565 - 0.24 0.24 0.24 12 8079 37 1 36 0 38
PDB_00570 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2257 21 0 21 0 22
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00573 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 6622 48 5 43 0 34
PDB_00584 - 0.47 0.53 0.43 9 1464 12 1 11 0 8
PDB_00725 - 0.82 0.80 0.86 12 581 2 0 2 0 3
PDB_00734 - 0.83 0.70 1.00 7 224 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00823 - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 183 7 0 7 0 9
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
PDB_00890 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 690 13 2 11 0 14
PDB_01009 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2455 25 3 20 2 14
PDB_01051 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 885 18 1 17 0 13
PDB_01074 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2747 28 3 25 0 25
PDB_01130 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1742 28 5 23 0 20
PDB_01199 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2116 29 2 27 0 24
RFA_00416 0.94 1.00 0.88 15 1468 6 2 0 4 0
RFA_00434 0.84 1.00 0.71 15 1410 8 6 0 2 0
RFA_00436 0.86 1.00 0.75 15 1411 7 5 0 2 0
RFA_00442 0.94 1.00 0.88 15 1414 4 2 0 2 0
RFA_00446 0.85 0.93 0.78 14 1467 7 3 1 3 1
RFA_00604 0.42 0.54 0.33 19 13472 53 14 25 14 16
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 978 13 0 12 1 14
RFA_00674 0.12 0.14 0.13 2 1112 15 0 14 1 12
RFA_00675 0.28 0.29 0.29 4 976 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00677 0.62 0.64 0.60 9 975 10 0 6 4 5
RFA_00684 0.74 0.71 0.77 10 977 5 2 1 2 4
RFA_00703 0.26 0.36 0.19 5 4252 32 5 16 11 9
RFA_00716 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 929 17 0 17 0 14
RFA_00717 0.64 0.64 0.64 9 889 5 2 3 0 5
RFA_00730 0.38 0.42 0.36 5 889 10 3 6 1 7
RFA_00763 0.38 0.42 0.36 5 889 10 3 6 1 7
RFA_00765 0.39 0.42 0.38 5 890 9 2 6 1 7
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0
SPR_00030 - 0.47 0.52 0.42 11 2459 16 2 13 1 10
SPR_00331 0.48 0.60 0.39 12 2744 19 6 13 0 8
SPR_00333 0.25 0.33 0.21 7 2741 27 10 17 0 14
SPR_00509 0.23 0.30 0.19 6 2895 25 8 17 0 14
SPR_00512 0.61 0.75 0.50 15 2896 15 6 9 0 5
SPR_00557 0.42 0.52 0.34 11 2818 22 8 13 1 10
SRP_00005 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3966 39 6 33 0 24
SRP_00038 0.23 0.27 0.20 9 5005 36 1 35 0 24
SRP_00193 - 0.16 0.19 0.15 7 6855 43 4 37 2 29
SRP_00200 0.41 0.47 0.35 17 6855 31 4 27 0 19
SRP_00216 0.44 0.48 0.41 13 3371 19 4 15 0 14
SRP_00233 0.25 0.30 0.22 10 5106 35 4 31 0 23
SRP_00243 0.47 0.55 0.40 17 5109 25 7 18 0 14
SRP_00273 0.36 0.40 0.33 16 6737 34 6 27 1 24
SRP_00303 0.36 0.41 0.33 13 6630 27 3 24 0 19
SRP_00338 0.52 0.56 0.49 20 5419 22 4 17 1 16
SRP_00342 0.20 0.24 0.17 6 3970 29 7 22 0 19
SRP_00383 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3205 35 9 26 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.