CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.590 > 0.566
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.581 ± 0.061 > 0.427 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.573 > 0.394
Positive Predictive Value 0.612 < 0.817
Total TP 850 > 584
Total TN 255663 < 256337
Total FP 740 > 188
Total FP CONTRA 77 > 43
Total FP INCONS 462 > 88
Total FP COMP 201 > 57
Total FN 633 < 899
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 850
Total TN 255663
Total FP 740
Total FP CONTRA 77
Total FP INCONS 462
Total FP COMP 201
Total FN 633
Total Scores
MCC 0.590
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.581 ± 0.061
Sensitivity 0.573
Positive Predictive Value 0.612
Nr of predictions 79

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
PDB_00213 0.87 0.80 0.94 33 5015 2 0 2 0 8
PDB_00553 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2677 25 1 23 1 23
PDB_00810 0.77 0.71 0.86 12 1067 2 0 2 0 5
PDB_01050 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 2 0 0 2 1
PDB_01051 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 892 6 0 2 4 4
PDB_01092 0.69 0.60 0.79 31 10114 11 1 7 3 21
PDB_01152 0.96 0.93 1.00 13 548 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00587 0.87 0.87 0.87 13 4836 14 0 2 12 2
RFA_00603 0.64 0.69 0.60 24 13490 20 4 12 4 11
RFA_00604 0.72 0.74 0.70 26 13493 24 2 9 13 9
RFA_00607 0.57 0.61 0.54 22 17725 25 6 13 6 14
RFA_00609 0.75 0.76 0.74 28 17917 28 2 8 18 9
RFA_00610 0.77 0.76 0.78 28 17169 23 2 6 15 9
RFA_00611 0.79 0.77 0.82 27 13008 13 0 6 7 8
RFA_00613 0.61 0.60 0.62 21 12846 17 4 9 4 14
RFA_00615 0.51 0.51 0.51 18 13331 18 8 9 1 17
RFA_00632 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 4068 18 0 16 2 17
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 17 2 14 1 16
RFA_00644 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2681 21 4 16 1 18
RFA_00645 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2401 15 3 11 1 18
RFA_00649 0.65 0.61 0.69 11 2129 8 1 4 3 7
RFA_00653 0.34 0.33 0.35 6 2128 12 3 8 1 12
RFA_00654 0.27 0.28 0.28 5 2397 14 2 11 1 13
RFA_00658 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 1116 5 0 3 2 5
RFA_00659 0.30 0.29 0.33 4 1116 10 1 7 2 10
RFA_00664 0.07 0.07 0.09 1 979 11 0 10 1 13
RFA_00667 0.30 0.29 0.33 4 978 8 1 7 0 10
RFA_00668 0.41 0.43 0.40 6 975 9 0 9 0 8
RFA_00672 0.17 0.15 0.20 2 893 9 0 8 1 11
RFA_00673 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 1118 6 0 5 1 9
RFA_00674 0.69 0.71 0.67 10 1113 6 0 5 1 4
RFA_00675 0.29 0.29 0.31 4 977 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00677 0.42 0.43 0.43 6 976 9 0 8 1 8
RFA_00678 0.66 0.64 0.69 9 933 4 0 4 0 5
RFA_00680 0.74 0.71 0.77 10 1115 6 0 3 3 4
RFA_00684 0.66 0.64 0.69 9 977 5 0 4 1 5
RFA_00685 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 980 6 0 5 1 9
RFA_00695 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 7008 29 1 3 25 5
RFA_00703 0.67 0.64 0.69 9 4265 18 1 3 14 5
RFA_00704 0.48 0.43 0.55 6 979 7 0 5 2 8
RFA_00705 0.69 0.71 0.67 10 1020 5 0 5 0 4
RFA_00706 0.44 0.36 0.56 5 1026 4 0 4 0 9
RFA_00707 0.07 0.07 0.10 1 1025 9 3 6 0 13
RFA_00708 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 1027 3 0 3 0 9
RFA_00709 0.16 0.14 0.20 2 980 9 0 8 1 12
RFA_00710 0.23 0.21 0.27 3 979 8 0 8 0 11
RFA_00711 0.40 0.36 0.45 5 1024 6 0 6 0 9
RFA_00716 0.06 0.07 0.08 1 933 12 0 12 0 13
RFA_00717 0.64 0.64 0.64 9 889 5 0 5 0 5
RFA_00730 0.69 0.67 0.73 8 892 4 1 2 1 4
RFA_00731 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00733 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00734 0.61 0.67 0.57 8 889 8 1 5 2 4
RFA_00736 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00737 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00745 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 934 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00749 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00758 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 892 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00762 0.64 0.67 0.62 8 890 6 1 4 1 4
RFA_00763 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 5 0 4 1 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 10 3 5 2 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 6 0 2 4 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 5 1 0 4 8
RFA_00781 0.55 0.56 0.55 18 5017 17 2 13 2 14
RFA_00786 0.71 0.72 0.70 23 5017 12 2 8 2 9
RFA_00791 0.50 0.50 0.52 16 5120 16 3 12 1 16
RFA_00792 0.90 0.88 0.93 28 5020 3 0 2 1 4
RFA_00801 0.59 0.59 0.59 19 5018 14 0 13 1 13
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 16 2 13 1 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 12 1 10 1 10

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 584
Total TN 256337
Total FP 188
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 88
Total FP COMP 57
Total FN 899
Total Scores
MCC 0.566
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.427 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.394
Positive Predictive Value 0.817
Nr of predictions 79

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
PDB_00213 0.76 0.59 1.00 24 5026 0 0 0 0 17
PDB_00553 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00716 0.50 0.39 0.64 9 2687 6 0 5 1 14
PDB_00810 0.42 0.18 1.00 3 1078 0 0 0 0 14
PDB_01050 0.92 0.85 1.00 11 619 2 0 0 2 2
PDB_01051 0.45 0.31 0.67 4 897 6 0 2 4 9
PDB_01092 0.72 0.62 0.84 32 10115 8 0 6 2 20
PDB_01152 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 551 0 0 0 0 4
RFA_00390 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1431 0 0 0 0 15
RFA_00416 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 1479 1 0 0 1 9
RFA_00433 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 1425 1 0 0 1 9
RFA_00587 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 4836 5 0 0 5 0
RFA_00603 0.63 0.51 0.78 18 13507 8 3 2 3 17
RFA_00604 0.73 0.66 0.82 23 13502 14 4 1 9 12
RFA_00607 0.71 0.56 0.91 20 17744 9 0 2 7 16
RFA_00609 0.82 0.68 1.00 25 17930 6 0 0 6 12
RFA_00610 0.81 0.70 0.93 26 17177 9 0 2 7 11
RFA_00611 0.68 0.57 0.80 20 13016 8 3 2 3 15
RFA_00613 0.58 0.46 0.73 16 12858 6 4 2 0 19
RFA_00615 0.63 0.51 0.78 18 13343 5 3 2 0 17
RFA_00632 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 4074 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00636 0.85 0.75 0.95 21 3983 1 1 0 0 7
RFA_00644 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2691 4 1 3 0 12
RFA_00645 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2403 12 3 9 0 18
RFA_00649 0.44 0.33 0.60 6 2135 4 1 3 0 12
RFA_00653 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2133 12 3 9 0 18
RFA_00654 0.39 0.28 0.56 5 2406 4 1 3 0 13
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00659 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00667 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 986 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00668 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00672 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00673 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00674 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00675 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00677 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00678 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 946 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00680 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00684 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 986 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00685 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00695 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00703 0.46 0.21 1.00 3 4275 0 0 0 0 11
RFA_00704 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 987 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00705 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00706 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00707 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00709 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00710 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00711 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 943 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00717 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00730 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00731 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00733 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00734 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00736 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00737 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00745 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 943 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00749 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00758 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00762 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00763 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00764 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00765 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 900 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00767 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.52 0.39 0.70 7 2006 3 3 0 0 11
RFA_00773 0.59 0.50 0.69 9 1940 4 4 0 0 9
RFA_00781 0.85 0.72 1.00 23 5027 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00786 0.79 0.63 1.00 20 5030 0 0 0 0 12
RFA_00791 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 5131 2 0 2 0 14
RFA_00792 0.81 0.72 0.92 23 5025 2 0 2 0 9
RFA_00801 0.74 0.63 0.87 20 5027 4 0 3 1 12
RFA_00808 0.58 0.56 0.60 9 2001 6 0 6 0 7
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.