CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(seed) Afold
MCC 0.590 > 0.573
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.070 < 0.559 ± 0.065
Sensitivity 0.463 < 0.557
Positive Predictive Value 0.758 > 0.594
Total TP 629 < 757
Total TN 231943 > 231499
Total FP 246 < 658
Total FP CONTRA 10 < 74
Total FP INCONS 191 < 443
Total FP COMP 45 < 141
Total FN 730 > 602
P-value 8.1815824276e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 629
Total TN 231943
Total FP 246
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 191
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 730
Total Scores
MCC 0.590
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.463
Positive Predictive Value 0.758
Nr of predictions 71

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 2 0 0 2 0
PDB_00213 0.85 0.73 1.00 30 5020 0 0 0 0 11
PDB_00553 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 11
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2688 13 0 13 0 23
PDB_00810 0.76 0.59 1.00 10 1071 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01050 0.68 0.46 1.00 6 624 1 0 0 1 7
PDB_01051 0.83 0.69 1.00 9 894 4 0 0 4 4
PDB_01092 0.38 0.21 0.69 11 10137 6 0 5 1 41
PDB_01152 0.92 0.86 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00603 0.70 0.60 0.81 21 13504 7 0 5 2 14
RFA_00604 0.63 0.51 0.78 18 13507 8 0 5 3 17
RFA_00607 0.08 0.06 0.13 2 17750 15 3 11 1 34
RFA_00609 0.32 0.22 0.47 8 17938 12 2 7 3 29
RFA_00610 0.39 0.30 0.52 11 17184 13 2 8 3 26
RFA_00611 0.65 0.51 0.82 18 13019 5 0 4 1 17
RFA_00613 0.70 0.57 0.87 20 12857 4 0 3 1 15
RFA_00615 0.57 0.49 0.68 17 13341 10 0 8 2 18
RFA_00632 0.27 0.25 0.29 7 4071 17 0 17 0 21
RFA_00636 0.71 0.64 0.78 18 3982 5 2 3 0 10
RFA_00644 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2693 8 0 8 0 18
RFA_00645 0.29 0.17 0.50 3 2409 3 0 3 0 15
RFA_00649 0.35 0.22 0.57 4 2138 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00653 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2137 8 0 8 0 18
RFA_00654 0.38 0.22 0.67 4 2409 2 0 2 0 14
RFA_00658 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00659 0.23 0.14 0.40 2 1123 4 0 3 1 12
RFA_00664 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00667 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00668 0.35 0.21 0.60 3 985 3 0 2 1 11
RFA_00672 0.41 0.31 0.57 4 896 3 0 3 0 9
RFA_00673 0.23 0.14 0.40 2 1123 4 0 3 1 12
RFA_00674 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00675 0.35 0.21 0.60 3 985 3 0 2 1 11
RFA_00677 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00678 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 940 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00680 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00684 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 984 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00685 0.32 0.21 0.50 3 984 4 0 3 1 11
RFA_00704 0.32 0.21 0.50 3 984 4 0 3 1 11
RFA_00705 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00706 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1029 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00707 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1029 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00709 0.32 0.21 0.50 3 984 4 0 3 1 11
RFA_00710 0.32 0.21 0.50 3 984 3 0 3 0 11
RFA_00711 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1029 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00716 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 940 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00717 0.30 0.21 0.43 3 896 4 0 4 0 11
RFA_00730 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00731 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00733 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00734 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00736 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00737 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00745 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 936 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00749 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00758 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 894 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00762 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00763 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00764 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00765 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00769 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00770 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00773 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1949 4 0 4 0 18
RFA_00781 0.97 0.94 1.00 30 5020 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00786 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 5021 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00791 0.92 0.88 0.97 28 5122 1 0 1 0 4
RFA_00792 0.97 0.94 1.00 30 5020 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00801 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 5021 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.41 0.38 0.46 6 2132 7 1 6 0 10

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 757
Total TN 231499
Total FP 658
Total FP CONTRA 74
Total FP INCONS 443
Total FP COMP 141
Total FN 602
Total Scores
MCC 0.573
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.559 ± 0.065
Sensitivity 0.557
Positive Predictive Value 0.594
Nr of predictions 71

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
PDB_00213 0.87 0.80 0.94 33 5015 2 0 2 0 8
PDB_00553 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2677 25 1 23 1 23
PDB_00810 0.77 0.71 0.86 12 1067 2 0 2 0 5
PDB_01050 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 2 0 0 2 1
PDB_01051 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 892 6 0 2 4 4
PDB_01092 0.69 0.60 0.79 31 10114 11 1 7 3 21
PDB_01152 0.96 0.93 1.00 13 548 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00603 0.64 0.69 0.60 24 13490 20 4 12 4 11
RFA_00604 0.72 0.74 0.70 26 13493 24 2 9 13 9
RFA_00607 0.57 0.61 0.54 22 17725 25 6 13 6 14
RFA_00609 0.75 0.76 0.74 28 17917 28 2 8 18 9
RFA_00610 0.77 0.76 0.78 28 17169 23 2 6 15 9
RFA_00611 0.79 0.77 0.82 27 13008 13 0 6 7 8
RFA_00613 0.61 0.60 0.62 21 12846 17 4 9 4 14
RFA_00615 0.51 0.51 0.51 18 13331 18 8 9 1 17
RFA_00632 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 4068 18 0 16 2 17
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 17 2 14 1 16
RFA_00644 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2681 21 4 16 1 18
RFA_00645 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2401 15 3 11 1 18
RFA_00649 0.65 0.61 0.69 11 2129 8 1 4 3 7
RFA_00653 0.34 0.33 0.35 6 2128 12 3 8 1 12
RFA_00654 0.27 0.28 0.28 5 2397 14 2 11 1 13
RFA_00658 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 1116 5 0 3 2 5
RFA_00659 0.30 0.29 0.33 4 1116 10 1 7 2 10
RFA_00664 0.07 0.07 0.09 1 979 11 0 10 1 13
RFA_00667 0.30 0.29 0.33 4 978 8 1 7 0 10
RFA_00668 0.41 0.43 0.40 6 975 9 0 9 0 8
RFA_00672 0.17 0.15 0.20 2 893 9 0 8 1 11
RFA_00673 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 1118 6 0 5 1 9
RFA_00674 0.69 0.71 0.67 10 1113 6 0 5 1 4
RFA_00675 0.29 0.29 0.31 4 977 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00677 0.42 0.43 0.43 6 976 9 0 8 1 8
RFA_00678 0.66 0.64 0.69 9 933 4 0 4 0 5
RFA_00680 0.74 0.71 0.77 10 1115 6 0 3 3 4
RFA_00684 0.66 0.64 0.69 9 977 5 0 4 1 5
RFA_00685 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 980 6 0 5 1 9
RFA_00704 0.48 0.43 0.55 6 979 7 0 5 2 8
RFA_00705 0.69 0.71 0.67 10 1020 5 0 5 0 4
RFA_00706 0.44 0.36 0.56 5 1026 4 0 4 0 9
RFA_00707 0.07 0.07 0.10 1 1025 9 3 6 0 13
RFA_00708 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 1027 3 0 3 0 9
RFA_00709 0.16 0.14 0.20 2 980 9 0 8 1 12
RFA_00710 0.23 0.21 0.27 3 979 8 0 8 0 11
RFA_00711 0.40 0.36 0.45 5 1024 6 0 6 0 9
RFA_00716 0.06 0.07 0.08 1 933 12 0 12 0 13
RFA_00717 0.64 0.64 0.64 9 889 5 0 5 0 5
RFA_00730 0.69 0.67 0.73 8 892 4 1 2 1 4
RFA_00731 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00733 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00734 0.61 0.67 0.57 8 889 8 1 5 2 4
RFA_00736 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00737 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00745 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 934 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00749 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00758 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 892 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00762 0.64 0.67 0.62 8 890 6 1 4 1 4
RFA_00763 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 0.66 0.67 0.67 8 891 5 1 3 1 4
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 10 3 5 2 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 6 0 2 4 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 5 1 0 4 8
RFA_00781 0.55 0.56 0.55 18 5017 17 2 13 2 14
RFA_00786 0.71 0.72 0.70 23 5017 12 2 8 2 9
RFA_00791 0.50 0.50 0.52 16 5120 16 3 12 1 16
RFA_00792 0.90 0.88 0.93 28 5020 3 0 2 1 4
RFA_00801 0.59 0.59 0.59 19 5018 14 0 13 1 13
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 16 2 13 1 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 12 1 10 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.