CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(seed) & PPfold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(seed) PPfold(20)
MCC 0.736 > 0.656
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.667 ± 0.095 > 0.504 ± 0.135
Sensitivity 0.607 > 0.507
Positive Predictive Value 0.898 > 0.856
Total TP 362 > 302
Total TN 55058 < 55108
Total FP 57 < 58
Total FP CONTRA 0 = 0
Total FP INCONS 41 < 51
Total FP COMP 16 > 7
Total FN 234 < 294
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(seed) and PPfold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and PPfold(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and PPfold(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(seed) and PPfold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and PPfold(20)).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 362
Total TN 55058
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 234
Total Scores
MCC 0.736
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.667 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.607
Positive Predictive Value 0.898
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 2 0 0 2 0
PDB_00213 0.85 0.73 1.00 30 5020 0 0 0 0 11
PDB_00553 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 11
PDB_00810 0.76 0.59 1.00 10 1071 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01050 0.68 0.46 1.00 6 624 1 0 0 1 7
PDB_01152 0.92 0.86 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00658 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00664 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00667 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00668 0.35 0.21 0.60 3 985 3 0 2 1 11
RFA_00672 0.41 0.31 0.57 4 896 3 0 3 0 9
RFA_00673 0.23 0.14 0.40 2 1123 4 0 3 1 12
RFA_00674 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00675 0.35 0.21 0.60 3 985 3 0 2 1 11
RFA_00677 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00678 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 940 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00680 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00704 0.32 0.21 0.50 3 984 4 0 3 1 11
RFA_00707 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1029 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00715 0.30 0.14 0.67 2 943 2 0 1 1 12
RFA_00717 0.30 0.21 0.43 3 896 4 0 4 0 11
RFA_00730 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00731 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00733 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00734 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00736 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00737 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00745 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 936 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00749 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00758 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 894 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00762 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00763 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00764 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00765 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00786 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 5021 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00791 0.92 0.88 0.97 28 5122 1 0 1 0 4
RFA_00792 0.97 0.94 1.00 30 5020 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00801 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 5021 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 302
Total TN 55108
Total FP 58
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 294
Total Scores
MCC 0.656
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.504 ± 0.135
Sensitivity 0.507
Positive Predictive Value 0.856
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 2 0 0 2 0
PDB_00213 0.84 0.71 1.00 29 5021 0 0 0 0 12
PDB_00553 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 461 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00810 0.80 0.65 1.00 11 1070 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01050 0.52 0.38 0.71 5 623 3 0 2 1 8
PDB_01152 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 551 0 0 0 0 4
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1127 1 0 1 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 989 1 0 1 0 14
RFA_00667 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 989 1 0 1 0 14
RFA_00668 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 989 1 0 1 0 14
RFA_00672 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 899 4 0 4 0 13
RFA_00673 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1127 1 0 1 0 14
RFA_00674 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 4 0 4 0 14
RFA_00675 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 989 1 0 1 0 14
RFA_00677 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 989 1 0 1 0 14
RFA_00678 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 945 1 0 1 0 14
RFA_00680 0.31 0.14 0.67 2 1125 1 0 1 0 12
RFA_00704 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 989 1 0 1 0 14
RFA_00707 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1032 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00715 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 945 1 0 1 0 14
RFA_00717 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 902 1 0 1 0 14
RFA_00730 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00731 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00733 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00734 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00736 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00737 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 3 0 2 1 3
RFA_00745 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00749 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00758 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 3 0 2 1 3
RFA_00762 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00763 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 892 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00764 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 892 1 0 0 1 1
RFA_00765 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00786 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 5021 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00791 0.90 0.88 0.93 28 5121 2 0 2 0 4
RFA_00792 0.89 0.84 0.93 27 5021 2 0 2 0 5
RFA_00801 0.89 0.84 0.93 27 5021 2 0 2 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.