CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(seed) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(seed) RDfolder
MCC 0.512 > 0.317
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.511 ± 0.074 > 0.285 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.382 > 0.254
Positive Predictive Value 0.696 > 0.411
Total TP 352 > 234
Total TN 83502 > 83439
Total FP 183 < 361
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 42
Total FP INCONS 151 < 293
Total FP COMP 29 > 26
Total FN 569 < 687
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(seed) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(seed) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 352
Total TN 83502
Total FP 183
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 151
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 569
Total Scores
MCC 0.512
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.511 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.382
Positive Predictive Value 0.696
Nr of predictions 62

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 938 3 0 3 0 9
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 2 0 0 2 0
PDB_00553 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 11
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2688 13 0 13 0 23
PDB_00810 0.76 0.59 1.00 10 1071 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01050 0.68 0.46 1.00 6 624 1 0 0 1 7
PDB_01051 0.83 0.69 1.00 9 894 4 0 0 4 4
PDB_01152 0.92 0.86 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00632 0.27 0.25 0.29 7 4071 17 0 17 0 21
RFA_00636 0.71 0.64 0.78 18 3982 5 2 3 0 10
RFA_00642 0.44 0.28 0.71 5 2919 2 0 2 0 13
RFA_00643 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2203 8 0 8 0 18
RFA_00644 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2693 8 0 8 0 18
RFA_00645 0.29 0.17 0.50 3 2409 3 0 3 0 15
RFA_00649 0.35 0.22 0.57 4 2138 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00651 0.35 0.22 0.57 4 2073 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00653 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2137 8 0 8 0 18
RFA_00654 0.38 0.22 0.67 4 2409 2 0 2 0 14
RFA_00658 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00659 0.23 0.14 0.40 2 1123 4 0 3 1 12
RFA_00664 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00667 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00668 0.35 0.21 0.60 3 985 3 0 2 1 11
RFA_00672 0.41 0.31 0.57 4 896 3 0 3 0 9
RFA_00673 0.23 0.14 0.40 2 1123 4 0 3 1 12
RFA_00674 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00675 0.35 0.21 0.60 3 985 3 0 2 1 11
RFA_00677 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00678 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 940 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00680 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00684 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 984 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00685 0.32 0.21 0.50 3 984 4 0 3 1 11
RFA_00704 0.32 0.21 0.50 3 984 4 0 3 1 11
RFA_00705 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00706 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1029 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00707 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1029 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00709 0.32 0.21 0.50 3 984 4 0 3 1 11
RFA_00710 0.32 0.21 0.50 3 984 3 0 3 0 11
RFA_00711 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1029 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00715 0.30 0.14 0.67 2 943 2 0 1 1 12
RFA_00716 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 940 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00717 0.30 0.21 0.43 3 896 4 0 4 0 11
RFA_00730 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00731 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00733 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00734 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00736 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00737 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00745 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 936 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00749 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00758 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 894 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00762 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00763 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00764 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00765 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00769 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00770 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00773 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1949 4 0 4 0 18
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.41 0.38 0.46 6 2132 7 1 6 0 10

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 234
Total TN 83439
Total FP 361
Total FP CONTRA 42
Total FP INCONS 293
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 687
Total Scores
MCC 0.317
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.285 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.254
Positive Predictive Value 0.411
Nr of predictions 62

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 3 0 0 3 0
PDB_00553 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2684 18 1 16 1 23
PDB_00810 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1078 3 0 3 0 17
PDB_01050 0.92 0.85 1.00 11 619 2 0 0 2 2
PDB_01051 0.79 0.69 0.90 9 893 5 0 1 4 4
PDB_01152 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 550 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00632 0.62 0.54 0.71 15 4074 6 1 5 0 13
RFA_00636 0.65 0.64 0.67 18 3978 9 3 6 0 10
RFA_00642 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2917 9 3 6 0 18
RFA_00643 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2205 6 0 6 0 18
RFA_00644 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2694 7 3 4 0 18
RFA_00645 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2410 5 1 4 0 18
RFA_00649 0.53 0.33 0.86 6 2138 1 0 1 0 12
RFA_00651 0.39 0.33 0.46 6 2067 7 0 7 0 12
RFA_00653 0.35 0.33 0.38 6 2129 10 2 8 0 12
RFA_00654 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2404 11 2 9 0 18
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00659 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1122 8 0 6 2 14
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 10 0 10 0 14
RFA_00667 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 982 8 1 7 0 14
RFA_00668 0.50 0.43 0.60 6 980 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00672 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 897 6 0 6 0 13
RFA_00673 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00674 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1122 6 0 6 0 14
RFA_00675 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 985 5 0 5 0 14
RFA_00677 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 984 6 0 6 0 14
RFA_00678 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 941 5 0 5 0 14
RFA_00680 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1121 7 2 5 0 14
RFA_00684 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 986 1 0 0 1 10
RFA_00685 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 982 4 0 3 1 9
RFA_00704 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 983 7 0 7 0 14
RFA_00705 0.74 0.71 0.77 10 1022 4 0 3 1 4
RFA_00706 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1027 8 0 8 0 14
RFA_00707 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1030 5 0 5 0 14
RFA_00708 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1028 7 0 7 0 14
RFA_00709 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 982 8 0 8 0 14
RFA_00710 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 980 6 0 5 1 9
RFA_00711 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1023 12 0 12 0 14
RFA_00715 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 940 6 0 6 0 14
RFA_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 939 7 0 7 0 14
RFA_00717 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 898 5 0 5 0 14
RFA_00730 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 897 6 1 5 0 12
RFA_00731 0.41 0.42 0.42 5 891 8 3 4 1 7
RFA_00733 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 898 5 0 5 0 12
RFA_00734 0.67 0.58 0.78 7 894 3 0 2 1 5
RFA_00736 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 892 7 1 5 1 7
RFA_00737 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 892 7 2 4 1 7
RFA_00745 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 938 8 2 6 0 12
RFA_00749 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 892 7 1 5 1 7
RFA_00758 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 900 3 0 3 0 12
RFA_00762 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 894 9 2 7 0 12
RFA_00763 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 897 6 1 5 0 12
RFA_00764 0.51 0.42 0.63 5 895 4 1 2 1 7
RFA_00765 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 892 7 2 4 1 7
RFA_00769 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 4 5 0 9
RFA_00770 0.47 0.39 0.58 7 2004 5 1 4 0 11
RFA_00773 0.67 0.50 0.90 9 1943 1 1 0 0 9
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 3 0 2 1 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.