CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.496 > 0.344
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.495 ± 0.126 > 0.265 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.287 > 0.128
Positive Predictive Value 0.863 < 0.927
Total TP 170 > 76
Total TN 87013 < 87128
Total FP 40 > 12
Total FP CONTRA 2 > 0
Total FP INCONS 25 > 6
Total FP COMP 13 > 6
Total FN 422 < 516
P-value 4.94031556815e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 170
Total TN 87013
Total FP 40
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 422
Total Scores
MCC 0.496
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.495 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.287
Positive Predictive Value 0.863
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 3 0 0 3 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00749 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00764 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00765 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 898 1 0 0 1 7
SPR_00277 0.72 0.52 1.00 11 2915 0 0 0 0 10
SPR_00721 0.72 0.57 0.92 12 2913 3 0 1 2 9
SPR_01157 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 2754 6 0 5 1 5
SRP_00020 0.52 0.27 1.00 9 5556 0 0 0 0 24
SRP_00058 0.30 0.09 1.00 3 5775 0 0 0 0 31
SRP_00084 0.30 0.09 1.00 3 5457 0 0 0 0 31
SRP_00105 0.30 0.09 1.00 3 5562 0 0 0 0 31
SRP_00134 0.32 0.10 1.00 3 5992 0 0 0 0 26
SRP_00141 0.27 0.07 1.00 3 6325 0 0 0 0 38
SRP_00231 0.53 0.47 0.59 16 5433 11 1 10 0 18
SRP_00273 0.56 0.48 0.66 19 6757 10 1 9 0 21
SRP_00274 0.28 0.08 1.00 3 6900 0 0 0 0 35
SRP_00338 0.29 0.08 1.00 3 5457 0 0 0 0 33
SRP_00341 0.31 0.10 1.00 3 4750 0 0 0 0 28
SRP_00357 0.29 0.08 1.00 3 5353 0 0 0 0 33

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 76
Total TN 87128
Total FP 12
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 516
Total Scores
MCC 0.344
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.265 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.128
Positive Predictive Value 0.927
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00390 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00416 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1470 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00433 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1416 2 0 0 2 0
RFA_00658 0.38 0.14 1.00 2 1126 1 0 0 1 12
RFA_00664 0.38 0.14 1.00 2 988 1 0 0 1 12
RFA_00749 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00764 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
RFA_00765 0.78 0.75 0.82 9 892 2 0 2 0 3
SPR_00277 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 21
SPR_00721 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 21
SPR_01157 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 21
SRP_00020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5565 0 0 0 0 33
SRP_00058 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5778 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00084 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00105 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5565 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00134 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5995 0 0 0 0 29
SRP_00141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6328 0 0 0 0 41
SRP_00231 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 34
SRP_00273 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6786 0 0 0 0 40
SRP_00274 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6903 0 0 0 0 38
SRP_00338 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5460 0 0 0 0 36
SRP_00341 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 31
SRP_00357 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5356 0 0 0 0 36

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.