CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.709 > 0.571
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.064 > 0.537 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.631 > 0.439
Positive Predictive Value 0.801 > 0.747
Total TP 942 > 656
Total TN 257884 < 258182
Total FP 311 > 269
Total FP CONTRA 44 > 10
Total FP INCONS 190 < 212
Total FP COMP 77 > 47
Total FN 552 < 838
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 942
Total TN 257884
Total FP 311
Total FP CONTRA 44
Total FP INCONS 190
Total FP COMP 77
Total FN 552
Total Scores
MCC 0.709
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.631
Positive Predictive Value 0.801
Nr of predictions 78

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.70 0.50 1.00 7 939 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 1 0 0 1 0
PDB_00213 0.83 0.73 0.94 30 5018 2 0 2 0 11
PDB_00553 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00716 0.25 0.22 0.29 5 2684 12 0 12 0 18
PDB_00810 0.84 0.71 1.00 12 1069 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_01050 0.78 0.62 1.00 8 622 1 0 0 1 5
PDB_01051 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 891 4 0 0 4 1
PDB_01092 0.74 0.60 0.91 31 10119 5 0 3 2 21
PDB_01152 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 550 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00603 0.78 0.71 0.86 25 13501 4 3 1 0 10
RFA_00604 0.74 0.63 0.88 22 13505 8 3 0 5 13
RFA_00605 0.43 0.34 0.55 12 15203 18 0 10 8 23
RFA_00607 0.91 0.83 1.00 30 17736 7 0 0 7 6
RFA_00609 0.92 0.89 0.94 33 17920 11 0 2 9 4
RFA_00610 0.89 0.84 0.94 31 17172 13 0 2 11 6
RFA_00611 0.77 0.69 0.86 24 13013 4 3 1 0 11
RFA_00613 0.73 0.66 0.82 23 12852 5 4 1 0 12
RFA_00615 0.78 0.71 0.86 25 13337 4 3 1 0 10
RFA_00632 0.51 0.50 0.52 14 4068 13 3 10 0 14
RFA_00636 0.64 0.64 0.64 18 3977 10 3 7 0 10
RFA_00642 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2923 3 0 3 0 18
RFA_00643 0.50 0.33 0.75 6 2203 2 0 2 0 12
RFA_00644 0.27 0.22 0.33 4 2689 9 3 5 1 14
RFA_00645 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2405 10 2 8 0 18
RFA_00649 0.75 0.61 0.92 11 2133 1 0 1 0 7
RFA_00651 0.76 0.72 0.81 13 2064 4 0 3 1 5
RFA_00653 0.29 0.28 0.31 5 2129 11 3 8 0 13
RFA_00654 0.62 0.39 1.00 7 2408 0 0 0 0 11
RFA_00658 0.69 0.64 0.75 9 1116 5 0 3 2 5
RFA_00659 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 1120 5 0 3 2 9
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 983 7 0 7 0 14
RFA_00667 0.30 0.29 0.33 4 978 9 1 7 1 10
RFA_00668 0.44 0.36 0.56 5 981 4 0 4 0 9
RFA_00672 0.68 0.46 1.00 6 897 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00673 0.44 0.36 0.56 5 1119 5 0 4 1 9
RFA_00674 0.74 0.71 0.77 10 1115 4 0 3 1 4
RFA_00675 0.35 0.29 0.44 4 981 5 0 5 0 10
RFA_00677 0.74 0.71 0.77 10 977 5 0 3 2 4
RFA_00678 0.80 0.64 1.00 9 937 0 0 0 0 5
RFA_00680 0.74 0.71 0.77 10 1115 5 0 3 2 4
RFA_00684 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 980 1 0 0 1 4
RFA_00685 0.53 0.43 0.67 6 981 4 0 3 1 8
RFA_00704 0.67 0.57 0.80 8 980 3 0 2 1 6
RFA_00705 0.77 0.71 0.83 10 1023 2 0 2 0 4
RFA_00706 0.33 0.29 0.40 4 1025 6 0 6 0 10
RFA_00707 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1027 8 0 8 0 14
RFA_00708 0.64 0.57 0.73 8 1024 3 0 3 0 6
RFA_00709 0.50 0.43 0.60 6 980 5 0 4 1 8
RFA_00710 0.70 0.50 1.00 7 983 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00711 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1025 3 0 3 0 7
RFA_00715 0.26 0.21 0.33 3 937 6 0 6 0 11
RFA_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 939 7 0 7 0 14
RFA_00717 0.80 0.64 1.00 9 894 0 0 0 0 5
RFA_00730 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00731 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00733 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00734 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00736 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00737 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00745 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 934 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00749 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00758 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 892 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00762 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 892 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00763 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00764 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00765 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 891 1 0 0 1 0
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.58 0.39 0.88 7 2008 1 0 1 0 11
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00781 0.92 0.94 0.91 30 5017 3 2 1 0 2
RFA_00786 0.92 0.91 0.94 29 5019 2 2 0 0 3
RFA_00791 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 5122 1 0 0 1 3
RFA_00792 0.97 0.94 1.00 30 5020 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00801 0.87 0.81 0.93 26 5022 3 0 2 1 6
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 656
Total TN 258182
Total FP 269
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 212
Total FP COMP 47
Total FN 838
Total Scores
MCC 0.571
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.537 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.439
Positive Predictive Value 0.747
Nr of predictions 78

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 938 3 0 3 0 9
PDB_00012 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 399 2 0 0 2 0
PDB_00213 0.85 0.73 1.00 30 5020 0 0 0 0 11
PDB_00553 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 11
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2688 13 0 13 0 23
PDB_00810 0.76 0.59 1.00 10 1071 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01050 0.68 0.46 1.00 6 624 1 0 0 1 7
PDB_01051 0.83 0.69 1.00 9 894 4 0 0 4 4
PDB_01092 0.38 0.21 0.69 11 10137 6 0 5 1 41
PDB_01152 0.92 0.86 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00603 0.70 0.60 0.81 21 13504 7 0 5 2 14
RFA_00604 0.63 0.51 0.78 18 13507 8 0 5 3 17
RFA_00605 0.14 0.06 0.33 2 15219 5 0 4 1 33
RFA_00607 0.08 0.06 0.13 2 17750 15 3 11 1 34
RFA_00609 0.32 0.22 0.47 8 17938 12 2 7 3 29
RFA_00610 0.39 0.30 0.52 11 17184 13 2 8 3 26
RFA_00611 0.65 0.51 0.82 18 13019 5 0 4 1 17
RFA_00613 0.70 0.57 0.87 20 12857 4 0 3 1 15
RFA_00615 0.57 0.49 0.68 17 13341 10 0 8 2 18
RFA_00632 0.27 0.25 0.29 7 4071 17 0 17 0 21
RFA_00636 0.71 0.64 0.78 18 3982 5 2 3 0 10
RFA_00642 0.44 0.28 0.71 5 2919 2 0 2 0 13
RFA_00643 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2203 8 0 8 0 18
RFA_00644 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2693 8 0 8 0 18
RFA_00645 0.29 0.17 0.50 3 2409 3 0 3 0 15
RFA_00649 0.35 0.22 0.57 4 2138 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00651 0.35 0.22 0.57 4 2073 3 0 3 0 14
RFA_00653 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2137 8 0 8 0 18
RFA_00654 0.38 0.22 0.67 4 2409 2 0 2 0 14
RFA_00658 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00659 0.23 0.14 0.40 2 1123 4 0 3 1 12
RFA_00664 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00667 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00668 0.35 0.21 0.60 3 985 3 0 2 1 11
RFA_00672 0.41 0.31 0.57 4 896 3 0 3 0 9
RFA_00673 0.23 0.14 0.40 2 1123 4 0 3 1 12
RFA_00674 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00675 0.35 0.21 0.60 3 985 3 0 2 1 11
RFA_00677 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 983 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00678 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 940 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00680 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1121 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00684 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 984 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00685 0.32 0.21 0.50 3 984 4 0 3 1 11
RFA_00704 0.32 0.21 0.50 3 984 4 0 3 1 11
RFA_00705 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00706 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1029 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00707 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1029 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00708 0.40 0.29 0.57 4 1028 4 0 3 1 10
RFA_00709 0.32 0.21 0.50 3 984 4 0 3 1 11
RFA_00710 0.32 0.21 0.50 3 984 3 0 3 0 11
RFA_00711 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 1029 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00715 0.30 0.14 0.67 2 943 2 0 1 1 12
RFA_00716 0.43 0.29 0.67 4 940 3 0 2 1 10
RFA_00717 0.30 0.21 0.43 3 896 4 0 4 0 11
RFA_00730 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00731 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00733 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00734 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00736 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00737 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00745 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 936 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00749 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00758 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 894 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00762 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00763 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00764 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00765 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 893 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00769 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00770 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00773 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1949 4 0 4 0 18
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00781 0.97 0.94 1.00 30 5020 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00786 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 5021 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00791 0.92 0.88 0.97 28 5122 1 0 1 0 4
RFA_00792 0.97 0.94 1.00 30 5020 0 0 0 0 2
RFA_00801 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 5021 0 0 0 0 3
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.41 0.38 0.46 6 2132 7 1 6 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.