CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for HotKnots & Multilign(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric HotKnots Multilign(seed)
MCC 0.519 > 0.485
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.511 ± 0.260 > 0.399 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.521 > 0.386
Positive Predictive Value 0.526 < 0.619
Total TP 112 > 83
Total TN 22658 < 22737
Total FP 117 > 52
Total FP CONTRA 8 > 6
Total FP INCONS 93 > 45
Total FP COMP 16 > 1
Total FN 103 < 132
P-value 4.52862048029e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of HotKnots and Multilign(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and Multilign(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and Multilign(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for HotKnots and Multilign(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and Multilign(seed)).

^top





Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 112
Total TN 22658
Total FP 117
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 93
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 103
Total Scores
MCC 0.519
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.511 ± 0.260
Sensitivity 0.521
Positive Predictive Value 0.526
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 1470 4 0 1 3 1
RFA_00654 0.27 0.28 0.28 5 2397 13 2 11 0 13
RFA_00658 0.59 0.50 0.70 7 1118 5 0 3 2 7
RFA_00664 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 980 11 0 10 1 14
RFA_00708 0.30 0.29 0.33 4 1023 10 0 8 2 10
RFA_00767 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1870 3 3 0 0 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1934 21 0 19 2 18
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1999 20 0 17 3 18
RFA_00773 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1934 22 0 19 3 18
RFA_00779 0.87 0.94 0.81 17 1932 4 3 1 0 1
RFA_00808 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 2000 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 83
Total TN 22737
Total FP 52
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 132
Total Scores
MCC 0.485
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.399 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.386
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00416 0.57 0.53 0.62 8 1472 6 1 4 1 7
RFA_00654 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2414 1 0 1 0 18
RFA_00658 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00664 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00708 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1035 0 0 0 0 14
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 0 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.60 0.56 0.64 9 2002 5 0 5 0 7
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.